Scot
Pro Bowler
- Messages
- 14,979
- Reaction score
- 6,267
View attachment 3901 View attachment 3902
since most of you guys are probably fat fucks, I ordered a lot in XL
That’s pretty damn funny!


View attachment 3901 View attachment 3902
since most of you guys are probably fat fucks, I ordered a lot in XL
Its not even a feud. It's just one of us pointing out that the other one is trolling.
I suspect he does it to spark posting. I really don't think he cant be that blatantly dumb.
No, it's actually one of us (you) getting angry and upset that not everyone is just mindlessly grunting agreement when you try to sell this stupid infantile shit.Its not even a feud. It's just one of us pointing out that the other one is trolling.
This bullshit of "the refs have conspired to help our opponents" is so infantile and stupid on its face, really it shouldn't even be dignified with replies.
No, it's actually one of us (you) getting angry and upset that not everyone is just mindlessly grunting agreement when you try to sell this stupid infantile shit.
Again, tons of proof out there. Anybody with two eyes can see it.
The disagreement is really simple. I don't allow for the nonsensical conspiracy moonbattery and you don't allow for simple happenstance combined with how sloppy, lazy and blatant we are about our holding.I've many times said I don't think its necessarily that the refs have "conspired to help our opponents" but there is CLEARLY something up. Whether its that some of these guys genuinely don't like the Cowboys, or maybe are deep into Vegas trouble, or are following instructions by th master because Goodell is PO'd over Zeke Elliott and Jerry I don't know, but there is something up.
Rather be a stooge than a moonbat nutboy.I subscribe to you being a stooge on this Dooms.
Rather be a stooge than a moonbat nutboy.
If you would allow for the slightest possibility of happenstance combined with our idiot coaching leading to lazy, sloppy blatant holding by us, you'd approach reason.
Just about all of them, compared to Ginger and his troupe.And out of curiosity, please name me the teams you believe are "well coached"
Every one we've discussed here with videos and pictures, have not been what you describe and you refuse to proof up and show us any. It's just your biased opinion.Again, numerous of these holding calls against us have been EXTREMELY picky to say the least, several this year were clear phantom calls.
Although some of this might have occurred, what I have seen is just blatant obvious bearhugs and the horse collars, the jersey stretches and the armbars. And these are what the refs are going to call when they see it. And no, they don't see everything. We got away with a few of these yesterday.They haven't all been where our games wrapped their arms around the other guys head and tackled him from behind.
It's just the loons who see what they want to see, and you're seeing what you want to see regardless of what it really is.Never mind the whole entire football world seeing the shit live
Did I not acknowledge that a long time ago, and again today? Of course it's strange, but it doesn't a x-files nutbar conspiracy support. I explained what I think is most likely, a combination of happenstance and the opponent being quite a bit better at hiding their holding than we are. Every offensive lineman gets away with holding, multiple times in every game. But the clumsy blatant obvious ones get caught a lot more.So it's been 20 quarters, 5 full football games since we've seen a ref call a holding penalty against the other team and Dooms doesn't think that sounds kind of strange?
I explained what I think is most likely, a combination of happenstance and the opponent being quite a bit better at hiding their holding than we are.
The difference between what the refs can easily see and what they can't easily see. It's basic stuff, you have blatant obvious holding and you have subtle, "hidden" holding. Watch o-line play more closely.I laughed so hard at your post last night I couldn't answer. I went to bed thinking I read it wrong and it would either disappear in the morning or I misunderstood it. I mean, what does that even mean? How do you "hide" a lineman holding?
The difference between what the refs can easily see and what they can't easily see. It's basic stuff, you have blatant obvious holding and you have subtle, "hidden" holding. Watch o-line play more closely.
Every training camp, the league sends officials to every team where they explain what generates calls. For offensive holding the standard is blatant/obvious holding. The bearhugs, arm bars, jersey grabs where the jersey stretches, the horse collars, stuff that is very easy to see. Offensive lineman for generations are coached to avoid these and instead keep the hands inside but still grab whatever they can grab. That's the subtle, "hidden" holding and it happens on almost every play.I watch O-line play very closely. I see the hooks and the holds. It's an arbitrary call that's left to the refs. You assume that they don't see it and I can agree to a certain point. It's human nature and everyone makes mistakes. But 20 quarters of football against a pretty decent D-line without one holding call is probably unheard of.
It's not legal, it's just the difference in what they look for.Sort of OT, but my question is, when did holding become basically legal as long as you don't put your arms around the defender?
When refs started showing up at training camp telling them what they look for? I don't know specifically when this all developed but even back as far as the 70s through the early 80s when I was playing ball they taught us how to get away with holding. How to hide it and what not to do as far as grabbing goes. In the NFL it's a highly developed and detailed art form.Or asked another way, when did coaches become so confident grabbing jersey wouldn't be called (as long as it's inside the torso) that coaches started actually teaching it that way?
Romo during the game Sunday even commented on it, saying Tyron Smith's more blatant holding is him compensating for his bad back. And the stats lend credence to that - before he was hurt you never saw him get called for holding. Because beast that he is, he never had to bearhug or horse collar.Hmm, interesting. I never remember it being taught by anyone when I was a kid but maybe that was coincidence.
I know I'm always surprised at how often it happens in the NFL. It really is multiple players on every single play.