Doomsday
High Plains Drifter
- Messages
- 22,795
- Reaction score
- 5,665
It's actually happened, but in freak instances when there's more than one violator of the pocket.I don't believe defenses will ever be able to catch Romo in the midst of a spin.
It's actually happened, but in freak instances when there's more than one violator of the pocket.I don't believe defenses will ever be able to catch Romo in the midst of a spin.
Linehan was just quoted the past week or so in a couple of articles as saying Garrett told him that was what they wanted going forward (when he was hired)
Garrett has also said he wanted a more balanced offense, a two TE base, etc in the past and never did it. Wanting something and actually committing to it are two different things.
Would we run this much if Garrett was calling plays? I really doubt it
It's actually happened, but in freak instances when there's more than one violator of the pocket.
They're working on it. They know his tendencies very well. Knowing and stopping though, two entirely different things.Right. I'm talking about a pre-meditated attempt in live action. Not a jail-break.
Yeah. What I said in my initial post!
That's what I've been saying. Romo is going to keep on using defender's own tendencies to bear down on him for the sack and their own momentum in that pursuit against them.
BUY it from ME! Have some semblance of self-reliance, asshole.Sell the site back to sheik!
Me too. Message boards being only one of my many hobbies.I would, but...I have a life
dbair, you can put the new era sig back up, we all know you want to
Like in week one where we prematurely gave up on a running game that saw DeMarco average over 6 yards a carry? Like that?
You're an idiot, dbair. You know exactly what I'm talking about. Week 1 was the same offense we've seen featured ever since Garrett has been in charge of it:
1. Not featuring a productive running game more.
2. Going into the shotgun in the redzone and passing out of it.