Search results

They call it "intoxication manslaughter" but so what? He KILLED a guy.

Nobody's arguing against that at all. But it doesn't HAVE to be the Dallas Cowboys, or the NFL either for that matter. So, when Dallas takes him back then he does this again, is that somehow worse? Could that be called enabling?

:lol

I didn't think it fair to mention that.

It only makes you enjoy them more. :tiphat

Welcome to The U, cowboycolors!

He punked out Hollywood too.

He's had three. The one where he killed a guy, happened the night before a fucking road game. You really want players out closing down bars and drinking until 2am, the night before a game? You really want this fuck to be taking a roster spot of some young kid who never killed anyone? How many...

Fallacious argument and a straw also, since no one's asserted anything is "okay." Completely irrelevant.

That question was rightly ignored earlier because it is a non sequitur. None of us are NFL players. It's a form of the appeal to mom fallacy - "Mom, the other kids do it toooooo." It never works, even on Mom.

Nice one!

And tell 'em to bring all the wimmens too.

Schmoopy and Manster - get avatars. :woohoo

SeeBS has to be pissed off at the crap schedule they have had so far this year.

:lol It's all I could do to keep him here, after I said we wouldn't be banning you right away.

Only if you want to live under a Nazi-like heavy moderation board. Otherwise, all are welcome here.

You watch him play and don't think for a minute he could have played OLB in the 3-4? Sure looks it to me.

We have to imagine I guess, that spending a 2nd round pick on Escobar might have had something to do with Witten's ruptured spleen and his overall age. But if he is a heir apparent you really need to work him into the offense some more.

With Watt your scheme really doesn't matter much. We played Ware in the 3-4, he's very comparable to watt.

They're wasting his talent currently.