Search results

They were "no names" because they were no names. SO highly regarded, they went in 2nd and 3rd rounds. They greatly OVER-achieved.

Stuff you really can't learn at practice speed. Emmitt Smith had trouble with blocking and protections early on too, but had the advantage of learning under fire, in full speed games. Hell, what back out of college is ever gonna not need learning in pro blocking and protections? Williams should...

It was the fact that they were in attack mode, all the time. Mostly. Williams was a no-name 3rd rounder, Step was from Pitt and a 3rd round no namer, and Allen was out of Sonoma State - not known as a powerhouse - and was late to the party. None of the above had their name and their reputation...

It still mystifies me why he isn't on the active roster, getting some touches.

I know you knew and were being a snark, it's all good. Reminded me to edit the thread title.

Schmoopy had a good point and since no one had picked the "Yes" option yet I was able to make it 5-1 without messing anything up.

Which is exactly how the 90s Cowboys made their no name, misfit o-line work. No first rounders, but many all-pros. Including Nate Newton, who Tex Schramm had advised Jerry not to "waste any time on."

I don't want them to win. I want Dallas to win. But I'm likely betting alot on Washington this week. Doesn't mean I won't also be putting alot on Dallas too, and even some on the tie bet. It's called hedging.

Seems weird you got Randle averaging over 6.5 yards per carry and he's not considered a worthy backup.

You can see who all bet where, just by clicking on the result.

I'm probably going to. Probably going to load up on them.

Pretty sure he means 15-1...

Place your bets win, lose or tie.

I don't like the game in London no matter the opponent, and I believe we drop at least one to the Eagles, probably the first one. My money is on "No."

Can we go 15-1? vBookie event So, let's bet on it shall we? We have until Sunday night to place a bet on this, yes or no.

That's right. The probability is very distinct if you are 6-1, to still go 8-8 or even 6-10. There is no distinct probability to go 16-0. You have one loss with nine games left. Alot can happen in nine games including, total collapse. In one play, Murray can be lost for the season. Dez. Tony...

When you're 6-1, 15-1 is certainly possible. So is 8-8, 6-10....

Hard to say, right? There is need, but what's available and at what cost?

Even if he doesn't collect alot of sacks himself, he might attract double teams which might allow others to collect sacks.

I expect the topic to include mature discussion and behavior.