Search results

Yeah it's not like 6 fumbles lost is that huge. It was just a non fumbling year for backs or what?

Might even bring in a young rookie as well. I think the Dunbar experiment has run its course.

I'm still just gun shy over a back who suddenly starts beasting it in a contract year. I don't think he beasts it anymore once he gets a longer term big money deal. Let someone else pay him. But on Dez yeah, I'll eat my hat and crow right now on him. Pay the man.

That's mean.

Was he the league leader in fumbles lost? I think we just, let him leave.

I think with a whole offseason to rest and rehab, he'll be good to go for a few more years.

I'd rather him eat the ball than give it to the opponent.

It seemed to me at least, for that play there were no other options and i wonder if that's the case. What if two guys had been down there with Dez? Do we just eat a sack and say oh well?

There's definitely a case for this.

One would think with all the rules that favor the offense, they wouldn't have such ticky tacky bullshit involved for defining what a catch is.

Especially when "entire process" is open to so much leeway and interpretation.

LOL

It was a ballsy call and a ballsy throw. Can't say we didn't go for the win.

Went deep without even play action.

THAT is THE question.

I am not questioning Tony's decision. I am questioning Red Ball's decision, and the play called.

Seemed to work every time we threw to Witten. I dunno. You're okay with the call and so am I. Probably why we're the only ones talking about it.

If you're gonna chuck it deep like that, why NEVER on 2nd and one or two? Fake the handoff and chuck it. Never happens. We just go hey diddle diddle, run up the middle. Then it's 3rd and one.

Right, not what I'm asking. What we did didn't fool them, so there's that. I suggest we get the five yards. It looked to me like there were no other options on the play but Hail Mary mother of frikkin Gawd.

Whole offense is playmakers. We need five yards.