Search results

Good ole taco had 5 last year. The definition of "productive" is apparently in question. 1.) Are you a backup because you're not productive, or are you "productive" only as a backup? 2.) Are you a doper because you're stupid, or are you stupid due to being a doper? Chicken and the egg.

The more relevant question: Do you? Why is he a backup? Oh yeah, because weed is more important. Get the clue. If you sign him you're just an enabler. He's gonna give you the absolute minimum it takes, to keep the checks coming. No more.

The flu has killed 100 more people this year, than this weak shit. Where's the flu hysteria? Oh yeah... We have a VACCINE for that which is about 45 percent effective, so it's okay. No hysteria or panic needed.

We don't actually have ANY productive DL guys. But that's not even the point. The doper ain't and hasn't been productive. And will never be.

That would double his career total!

Asked and answered earlier. Nobody's going to pay the big contract to a 4th year guy when they can draft #1 and pay him on the cheap for four years. Nobody's that stupid, especially when it's a QB with no accomplishments, no skins on the wall.

Where's ANY evidence of that?

Mark Stepnoski rapidly comes to mind. Highly intelligent, nobody knew he was a weed smoker until he told them. Gregory - highly unintelligent. (Pun intended.)

I've discovered the REAL threat to humanity, and have named it the "Hysteria Virus."

That alone is plenty good enough for a QB to get a fat new contract in Dallas. You don't need any significant accomplishments, don't need any championships or any other skins on the wall. Just stats.

Based mainly I think, on the Jonses' known lack of anything resembling balls.

Thinking that you're getting a better QB in the 1st round in this draft, than we got in the 4th round of the 2016 draft, ain't a stretch. This is a large and quality class of quarterbacks. Not seen since the 83 draft. It's also a rich WR draft. But for what we are and what we can risk? I say...

THIS draft. Draft a QB in the first round, now. Regardless of signing Dak or not. Regardless of if they think Dak is "it" or not.

Yes it sure as fuck IS acrimonious. He turned down your more than generous offer, putting all his chips forward betting on what turned out to be a losing hand. He does NOT get to rake in the chips now. He takes what the fuck you offer now. He lost his fucking gamble!

Nobody in the WWE company actually works a match. They strictly follow the choreography. They do everything as rehearsed and practiced. Working a match is when we enter the ring knowing ONLY the outcome and nothing else. Every move and the story you're telling is getting called in the ring...

Haven't watched it at all. Vince tried to put it directly up against AEW and so far it's a losing proposition in the ratings. Of course the vibe is different, it's a developmental league.

I think that's right. Cheaper though I think, to use the non-exclusive tag. The 2 first round picks is why we never see a QB change teams if he's non-exclusiv tagged.

EDIT I looked up and you're right. I stand corrected.

The major difference is polish - WWE has their product so polished it's antiseptic and unwatchable. And the amount of TALK. WWE is clogged up with WAY too much talk, and the ratings on FOX are dismal for the two above reasons. AEW starts the action immediately and keeps TALK and promos to a...