Search results

All of this reminds me, it IS about time for the official "predict the season" thread. Who traditionally starts that thread?

You weren't saying "CAN go." You were saying WILL go. See the difference? Of fucking course the team CAN go 4-1. It CAN go 0-5. Are you a coward as well as a sissy?

And you chickened on a BET after saying you predict 4-1. I STILL see 1-4 or possibly 2-3 on the way to either 8-8 or 9-7 season. He didn't? Oh, it's HIM bringing the shit up from 2 weeks ago in several threads? No, it's YOU. And yes, myself and others agree you WERE mindlessly cheerleading, in...

I'm amending this to add - if we have a bunch of stupid penalties and turnovers yeah, we can lose to this Giants team. This is the NFL, you can't expect to win games turning the ball over. Tony Romo and Dez, notwithstanding.

You say this in complete contradiction to what you said in the thread linked, that you "see only positive." And "positive" is NOT exactly how things are! And it is NOT exactly as you claimed. You said a "moderator" jumped on you for being positive, and anyone reading that thread can see you...

LOL

Now see? It wasn't as you claimed. There is a difference between cheerleading, and just positive outlook. We all want the team to win, but most of us aren't just wearing blinders and rose colored glasses about it. Get back to me when someone here gets banned for being either positive, or...

Any "negative fans" get banned there, first they claim it's a "redskins fan troll" then they find some supposed rule and drop the hammer.

Please find that and quote it. I don't remember it that way at all.

I can't figure a way Dallas loses this game unless we lose Tony early in it. And even then we probably win a FG battle with the feckless Giants. Dallas.

Midswat is the vBookie guy starting middle of last season. HOWEVER I am giving everyone 100K to start the new season.

I remember this guy! Never was worth a shit actually.

Ahh, I'd forgotten we traded Bielski to the Coats, then he coached there too.

That's a stumper, because if memory serves O'Brien is quite a bit younger than Bielski. Nephew perhaps?

This dude is the Limey, pretty sure. London?

Yep, he COULD if they would use him. "There must be, 50 ways to get a runner...."

Looks stunning there's no interest, right? Except there was and is.

They signed Showers to the PS instead.

LOL

THATS the spirit! (Almost. You got the weak part right but it's not really a cut down, it's a rhetorical request.) Keep working at it s0n.