Search results

Oh, woah woah woah. No. I missed this before. What's happening is, offenses are being extremely conservative against us, because they KNOW we can't do shit to them offensively. Then when they need either a FG or a TD to finish us off? They. Get. What. They. Need. Each and every time. It's the...

SO..... One week later, how's this working out? I see it is quite active. Any comments, suggestions, complaints?

At his core he is a coward, so all the under the bus throwing will go on behind closed doors.

They can't just tell the delegates how to vote. And, that's the bluff.

This is huge. Problem is, clueless Ginger doesn't realize his kick coverage is suspect. And the writer forgot: Claiborne is bomb bait - teams go after him because they know he sucks. Dez is far too easily taken away

Yeah but all that said, he's still bluffing. He's not in this to do anything except win, I believe. He could word it differently but people who keep it rational and aren't prone to emotional outbursts understand what he's really talking about, re: stopping Muslim entry for a time. My issues with...

The 6-6-plus, mobile strong as a bull QB is the future IMO. I don't care what color they are. Gimme BIG hands, 6-7 and 240lbs, a really strong arm, powerful running, some good speed, and brains. Like Osweiler.

He's not stupid. He's not Perot. And he's not a Clintoon lover. He was a schmoozer like millions of other uber-rich people were in the 90s.

He wants to WIN and he knows he cannot win without that (R) nomination. So it's just bluff and bluster.

You FIX that in the practices of it you fucking just claimed to have. This is all after the fact crap someone told him he needed to say, he didn't realize any of it during the game.

Whaaaat? No comments on this?

And when you watch that scoring play it's clear they weren't laying down and letting us score, and we just simply blew them out of there. So there was never any intent on our part, to not score the TD.

That's right - Garrett's just been sandbagging! Keeping Street quiet until the best strategic time to unleash him! LOL

DING! And all this is if, and that's a BIG if - Garrett even realized McFadden needed to stay in bounds. I somehow doubt it. Like I said earlier, he probably had to be told that was a screw up. You don't fucking run a weak side sweep if you want the play to end, in bounds.

That's it. That is the "or" in the rule you quoted. It's not two clocks, it is one clock that starts with either 40 seconds or 25 seconds on it.

At any rate had this all been done right, McFadden stays in bounds, and we run off max time after each knee, then after either we make or miss the FG, there should have been anywhere between 18 and 14 seconds left when we kick the ball off. From there all bets are off because we don't know if...

When the play ends in the field of play and isn't a incomplete pass, the play is whistled dead the ref spots the ball and the 40 second play clock starts, the game clock never stops. UNLESS there is a stoppage via timeout or penalty. If either, then it is the 25 second clock with the game clock...

Noooo.... There is no 25 second clock if the 40 second one is already running. I don't understand what you're asking here.

That 40 second clock starts immediately after the previous play is whistled dead. Only the 25 second clock is started by the official by announcing the ball ready for play.

Pretty sure of it. Then the time is consumed, by the kick. Game over. This includes penalties. You only have a 25 second play clock, after the ball is whistled ready for play after a penalty. Yeah, assuming McFadden doesn't have his brain fart. Since he did, I am only going off what happens from...