Search results

Yeah that's IF someone had a fucking crystal ball. Woulda coulda shoulda - if the dog hadn't stopped to shit he coulda caught that rabbit. Hindsight is always 20-20.

If Dallas takes a QB at #4 I'd about die of shock.

2nd or 3rd for a QB is quite optimistic. I still say they won't pick one at all and if they do, late round. They simply do not see the QB position as a big problem. There's no evidence in their draft history, to support that. Yes theoretically we SHOULD end up with a defensive difference maker...

We just went through two QBs who couldn't win here, but then won elsewhere in the same season. The problem is this offense is SO tailored to Romo that when you bring in another guy they feel they have to water it way, way down. And dismal performance is the result. Moore's not any answer. Most...

Same here. I'm simply more convinced that the more pundits and fans say we need to use that #4 pick to get the future QB, the less Jerruh will be inclined to do so.

Something the "stimulus" was advertised to fix by the way. It was one of the major, demagogued selling points of that crony payoff scam.

Problem I have with the thread premise... It's really not "reactionary" to realize this defense sucks. Offense puts butts in seats, sells swag, and drives TV ratings. Defense wins championships.

Made me spit my coffee.

While no one remembers that in ALLLLL of the Robin hood stories, not ONE poor person was ever helped!

He cannot possibly DIE soon enough to suit me.

It's a pretty angry electorate and that includes the Indys, so definitely "moderates" are out in the cold this time around.

Independent voters rule the roost. Doesn't matter their gender or skin color, they far outnumber any other group or stripe. And at this point I don't see any candidate that I as a Independent, really like. That said, I wouldn't mind Bernie winning the Dem nomination, and as long as it isn't...

Fight! Scratch! Claw! While I hold that pillow!

That explains why you're not laughing then. The post was factual therefore very likely anathema to you. I'm not the idiot who signed a crippled QB to a 60 million dollar deal without all due diligence, including a market test and a physical.

That's why it's kind of a pointless exercise to even mention it, really. However I am infamously guilty on this site, of calling for Jerry to let Romo test the waters in the market at least, before offering him that big contract. Time shows, I was right. In fact I seem to remember saying then...

But, would anyone ever even consider such a trade, even two years ago. Pretty easy to talk Romo trades now and there's probably several QB's who now qualify.

Annnnnd.... It just happened. Obama's Exec order empowering the EPA to adopt stringent new rules for coal fired power plants? Trying to make good on his campaign promise to put them out of business, while bypassing Congress? Stopped. Supreme Court freezes Obama plan to limit carbon emissions -...

You mean, trade Romo for cam?

And checks the latest qb injury, starts warming up the backup.

AND the desire to really run the ball. Which, isn't Ginger's style or preference.