Search results

"If the salary cap didn't exist, Murray would still be a Dallas Cowboy." - Obi-Drunk Jerry

We really liked Murray. Didn't use the tag on him. Yeah, i know we used it on Dez but as I said at the time, should have used it on Murray and done a deal with Dez.

That's the hope anyway. No, it was just talking head speculation. Which is right where you're gonna be with whatever QB we take in this top five, regardless of how much Romo plays.

Because they weren't fully confident he's their guy, because he got to "sit and learn" instead of playing. Plus, do you really risk losing Von Miller over a 2nd round pick that hasn't played? You really think they would use the tag on a guy they're not sure of? Denver didn't.

Where? Link Please.

I haven't been able to find ANYTHING that verifies what was said here. It looks like just random scuttlebutt.

But like Obi-Drunk Jerry recently said, if their projection of 4-5 more years out of Romo comes about, you have a Osweiler situation and with still little clue he's the guy or not. His rookie contract is up and you're stuck. If you take a QB in the top 5 picks of the draft, he is your guy NOW...

I am comfortable chalking up 7 or 8 W's if they stay healthy and play really well. I'd go for 10 or 11 if I could know they're also going to get some good luck. But then, of course it's a one and done playoff team if it gets 10 or 11. Or 12. Or 13.

Plus, he is already a polished pass blocker. Very rare to see that in a back just coming out of college.

Can't say they're not aggressive this draft.

Drew Rosenhaus just dropped Johnny like a bad habit - he now has no agent. Also, he was involved in a hit and run near LA today, was passenger in the run vehicle.

And he is correct. 8-8 is right in between those.

Seems like they really do believe they have a near pat hand. They really do think this is a 12-4 team, without the injuries.

Trump set the trap for himself, and also wasn't prepped to understand this was a unfriendly interview. There's no way to come out of watching that, thinking he'd been well versed on the subject matter. He shot himself in the foot and gave Matthews his second ever "thrill up his leg."

Did you watch the segment? Donald Trump's Hazy Stance On Abortion 'Punishment' | Hardball | MSNBC - YouTube

If you believe human life begins at conception. It's human DNA right? So is sperm, fingernail clippings - you're slaughtering human cells. If they want to risk their health doing abortions as a form of birth control, that's their dumb ass - but not on the public dime. Birth control sometimes...

LOL

Except, there's never been a time in our history when abortion was banned, that the female gets punished for getting one. It's always been the Sot who is illegally providing it, who gets the hammer not the female. Whether that's 'fair' or right or not, is of course debatable. But I would be...

No, Trump first proposed the hypothetical about if Roe v. Wade were overturned, and said there would have to be some penalty if abortion were banned. Matthews then gleefully pounced. That was a completely self-inflicted wound by Trump there.

None, as I said. No matter who was available. Who says they try to adhere to that? I still assert they had no intentions of drafting a RB under any circumstances. And, they did not. Like I did with everlast, I am very amenable to cancelling any such bet with no foul if circumstances warrant...