Search results

Well. The Philly coach wanted to know if Dak could play from behind. Check. He wanted to know if Dak could handle lots of pressure. Check. He was curious if Dak could handle exotic coverages. Check. But most of all, he wanted to know if Dak could overcome a bye week full of idiots like...

The last time you little Iggle bitches got so upset over a Dallas running back, you paid him unnecessary millions to sign him away from us, and gave us a 4th round compensatory pick which we used to draft the REAL problem you should be worried about, Dak. Thanks Philadelphia, you fucking...

God damn, this is stupid. You think the evildewars will just throw up their hands and say "well shit, there's term limits now. Can't buy politicians like we used to." No. Instead while they have the lame duck one doing their bidding without thought of consequence and no one to answer to in his...

He wouldn't "bug" you if he were in Philly though.

No it's not! If you think there is corruption, quid pro quo and pay for play now with members of congress, wait until you get a newly re-elected senator on what he knows is his last 6 year term because he can't run again, and therefore knows he has no constituents to answer to! He doesn't have...

Yep and we've never come anywhere close to replacing Woody.

That was a good, refreshing read. Thanks for posting it.

But there's NO way we're dumb enough to trade Romo anytime soon. Not unless it's some silly ridiculous deal involving a need veteran and a 1st round pick for him. I have a feeling we are gonna NEED Romo this season when Dak gets a ding. Would be dumb to trade him during this season.

Yeah pity da foos if we ever do.

ALLLLLL of this is supposition, Boys. I asked for actual things Tony can do, that Dak cannot. That's not a argument, it's just a fact. And no it does not follow that Showers offers jack shit at QB. My argument is, nobody can name one fact that makes Romo better or helps us win, more than Dak...

Also not the first time we've recognized that here.... In fact we had a great little thread about it last offseason. We know we've been mostly lied to about his back, but it is unclear who the original liar was - Jerry lying to us, or Tony lying to Jerry. But of course either way, the lies...

It's a theoretical advantage, not a real one. As you just said. Also, experience sometimes and more often than not translates to 'paralysis through analysis.' You stand there juuuuuuust a bit too long. Gets worse as you get older, as a QB. Please name one thing Romo can do, which Dak cannot.

Problem is you confuse 'reality' with 'negativity.' They're not the same thing and they're not interchangeable. You're also guilty of selective reading, seeming to respond only to posts you think are 'negative.' What, you want everyone to be just a dumbass homer/cheerleader? There's boards for...

I mean.... I am yet to see anyone tell what there is Romo can do, that Dak cannot do. There's lots of things Dak can do, which Tony cannot.

for us to have a chance to win those games.

Yeah I think we just mash 'em, IF Ginger doesn't decide we're fancy now after a extra week to 'work' on the offense. Keep It Simple Stupid.

Is he just about the ugliest fuck we've ever seen though?

What exactly am I wrong about? Dak gives us dimensions Romo never could. He causes problems for opposing DCs Romo never could. It's not a knock on Romo, to admit that. Those with a 'protect Romo's legacy' agenda would be the only ones having a problem with it.