Search results

This is IF he stays true to what he is and doesn't worry about pleasing Opie. We shall see. But my deal is I see more Aikman in him than I see Romo. Think about that.

Actual date on that is found here. YOU HATER!!!!! LOL

I didn't see any post where you hated on him. Please copy and paste.

No, I was responding to what I thought was a bbgun post, about Zeke..

Dude, where did you hate on him? I saw this:

Yes, there was. Just ask all the players who voted in the NFL Network's top 100 poll. We snuck up on them mainly because of this:

Props. Exactly right. Dallas never, ever, in it's wildest fondelest dreams ever thought they were drafting a starting QB, and neither did anyone else except Scot!

dbair, I stand in respect to you. Amazing what a little motivation can do. I congratulate you, for digging all this shit up, it's very revealing. You are The Man at DCU. I've rewarded you accordingly not just for that, but for always sticking up for your beliefs and always being here, your...

Here's the 2016 NFL Draft thread, for easy clickage for anyone reading along: 2016 NFL Draft Thread...

It is THE point. Thank you.

Some interesting ones.... You didn't want us to draft Dak and if we did you thought he would make a better tight end or fullback? Dbair says convert Dak if drafted Dbair says draft other QB, not Dak at #4 Haven't found where you said he was "garbage" yet, but damn s0n.

That's YOUR assumption. I am asserting ONLY that since they cut Whitehead without having any of the facts, they have NO moral high ground to be squealing "innocent until proven guilty" over the Zeke suspension. Do you not get that? Right, that's their constant excuse for their pattern of keeping...

I agree. They possibly could have cut him any time. Like, last year for example. Because they really do NOT believe in "innocent until proven guilty."

Highlight them, click the resulting quote button. Highlight and copy that text. Then paste it into your replies to this thread. Alternatively, you can just link them. Copy the link to the posts by copying the link location of the post number. You could even, link the entire thread URL. It's...

Then why was he still on the roster? See? NO. They cut him because of the false accusation. They did it in a kneejerk move, without all the facts. I concede "last straw" but the point is, it was a FALSE last straw. HE WOULD STILL BE A COWBOY WITHOUT THE FALSE ACCUSATION!

That's NOT the point. You're trying to MAKE it the point because you can't intelligently argue any other way. They allowed a false police report to be their "last straw," took action without all the facts, and in doing so have lost all moral high ground around "innocent until proven guilty."...

And therefore he probably makes, that roster. It's the New York Jest.

This isn't debatable and I haven't debated it. On most any other player they would have waited at least a day or two for all the facts to come in before taking any action. That's beside the point. They allowed a false police report to be their "last straw," took action without all the facts...

I won't dispute any of this. It's only three more wins than I'm expecting and lots can happen to other teams too. Garrett is a chronic symptom of the Jerry cancer.

Oh, jeez. Puhleez.