Search results

Complete bullshit. Either of those teams could have won a title with better overall coaching. And the 2009 team actually went into the playoffs on a major roll. We won our last 3, including a major upset at undefeated New Orleans, a game our D dominated an unstoppable New Orleans team. We then...

Only BB does that

You can't make this shit up.

CeeDee with the de-cleater

I think if you click on your name and then go to preferences you can change it there.

The 2007 and 2009 teams had defenses good enough to win championships, and frankly an overall roster that could have won at least one, if not two super bowls. Coaching was a massive issue with those teams, as it was under Garrett's idiot watch as well.

I can't believe the stupidity of Zoners (I know, after all these years I should, but it never ceases to amaze me) There are some of those retards that actually believe DiNucci has starters ability right NOW. He'll likely beat out no-talent flub Cooper Rush but if he does, he'll be the 3rd QB...

Isnt that the game where the Bills tried to ice Nick Folk and then he nailed the 2nd kick anyway to win the game?

Maybe they were trying to get ahead of other teams they thought might take one, and assumed since Dallas might be targeting other positions we'd be fine with trading down.

That part I don't believe at all.

^ L O L

Ben DiNucci, 2nd one has highlights from when he was at Pitt too:

Bradley Anae:

Tyler Biadasz, play first one with sound has analysis from Voch Lombardi:

Reggie Robinson II highlights:

88 looks better for a WR in my opinion. I'm sure Jerry is thinking of the marketing $$$ associated with it more than anything else, but at the end of the day its just a damn number.

Yep, it's true. They were trying to get the Falcons pick (that I know of for sure, the locals mentioned the potential trade) and reportedly told the Eagles they'd have to have their 2nd to do it, and the Eagles said no.