Search results

With three first round picks in it, it should be. One would think. Who the fuck has ever done that, ever?

Now if we could just get the idiot fans to not go to the games, not buy the swag, maybe Jerry wakes the fuck up.

Galloway's just a hater.:laugh3

They skipped the conditioning test drills, to avoid any.

Well, we didn't see anyone ask Jon Gruden, or some of the other former coach turned commentators if they would have drafted Sam. Intent might not have been malicious, just somewhat politically driven and with the benefit of having a "viral" story if the answer wasn't just oh so perfect. And as...

I mean, it's not a stretch to believe that the hip sports writer asked the known evangelical coach the question about whether he would draft a openly gay player, as bait. Hoping to get a story, some controversy. Stupidly, the coach gave him just that.

Romo himself alluded to as much, in a AP article I read this week.

There's really no reason to be asking about a late 7th round pick other than the special circumstance of the player, as bbgun was saying. But Dungy should have known that and simply not taken the bait.

He might have been forced to ask a question directly related to that, yes. But as far as "allowing" a duck, what's he gonna do? Put Dungy in a Daniel Bryan headlock until he answers? Waterboard Dungy, perhaps? So, let's say the reporter does ask the direct question. Dungy still has the straight...

Or, once you get that big contract, for some.

I really don't have one but I suspect it's got to do with lack of respect for the coaching.

:funny

Just to see if he would take the bait. Which he did. There is NO reason for any analyst who once was a coach to have anything in his answers at all about any player really - Manziel included - that isn't strictly football oriented. It's not a requirement. Dungy stepped in it, I imagine he...

Easy and truthful answer for Dungy would have been, "Sure I would draft him if he presented us a upgrade to the position. But if not, no."

Austin wasn't the only malingerer, and I suspect there's another reason it happens in Dallas that is totally unrelated to whoever is playing QB.

You're correct but that's also what I based my comments on. The question put to him wasn't "would you not draft Sam because he is gay" the question was, "Would you have drafted Sam." There was no reason for Dungy to answer based on anything but football related reasoning. It's not like the guy...

And thusly, we see where the question came from, why he was asked. He should have had the brains to stay off this new third rail and kept his comments entirely football related. There's enough football reasons not to draft Sam and it wasn't necessary to address the player's bedroom choices at...

Well... He's only 24 and should have fresh legs at least. #34 on the program this preseason.

And that's why they probably won't. If he can't play DL for shit, they will rave about what a great special teams contributor he is, or some shit. They'll keep him. Political based affirmative action has come to the NFL.

And I just bet you the hamstring "problem" is totally gone. I am convinced Austin was just a malingerer for the last two years in Dallas at least, for reasons only he knows.