Search results

What he's really saying there is he knows the "fans" are idiot sheep and will keep buying the swag, buying tickets, etc. And he's been right so far, through .500 ball since 1997.

Heh. I found it hard to believe at first, then gave it some thought.

Exactly. It's not like they wouldn't be able to replace recalcitrant sponsors who also fell victim to the minority squealing PC piglets. Because just think - why were the message planes hired to fly over NFL stadiums? Because the goons who hired them knew there would be big crowds in those...

Ok, they were doing it via the web, not at the stadium. And for playoff games and the conference championship games back in January, not regular season. But again, I can sort of see why. They have no trouble at all filling their relatively small stadium with their local and regional fans. They...

The deal is, once you cross that line and start catering and pandering to every little squealing piglet of Political Correctness, you're in a trap. The loud, shrill minority PC piglets wind up running the place - and like all parasites, they devour the host.

Of course, thinking on it now I can almost see a team like Seattle doing that. They have a comparatively small stadium, without the pressures Jerry has of filling it.

Ahh Man.... I gotta see a credible news link for this one.

Three sacks, minus 26 yds. 4 hits. Vs. Tennessee 4 sacks, minus 28, 5 hits. Vs. St Louis a BIG improvement - No sacks, NO hits. So, it's exactly as I fucking said. This last game was the first one where he wasn't sacked, or beat up much with hits. He was peppered all day, all of the first...

You have the bolded part right and the rest is reasonable and could well come true too.

Who asked such a stupid fucking question anyway. It's a public venue the entire idea of which is to sell tickets, put butts in seats and milk more dollars out of those butts with swag, concession and booze. It doesn't make a fuck which team the butts root for.

Thank you for the valid and informative correction. I stand corrected yet again.

My beef is, you have the #32 defense in the league that's been bad for a long time, because they have been concentrating on their shiny toy, Romo - for all these years - making the offense what they themselves term, "More Romo Friendly." To the detriment of just about everything else. You...

Right, you can pretend Jerruh and his son do things that way all you want. You see what's being built? :lol

You clearly aren't watching the same games I am. This last game was the first one where he wasn't sacked, or beat up much with hits. He was peppered all day, all of the first two.

What they said was, the Cowboys have a 46 man roster. That might have been the roster size in like, 1990 or something.

Who ever said anyone was supposed to be polite? Not a recruit, she just followed a facebook link. :smile1

Right the deed is done, might as well finish the job. Definitely agreed on the rest too, with addition of: the coaching was also much better. We could actually develop people.

They didn't. It was still all about propping up Romo. Need moar offensive linemen.

Not Smith but definitely Martin. They operated at almost total neglect of the worst defense in history last draft. I still maintain Martin would have been available later, in the second round. I know, shoot me. I just can't see how you draft your third O-Lineman in the first round having come...

D-Lineman can impact right away, as can linebackers. O-Lineman take some time to develop no matter what round they're picked from, and same often holds true for secondary help.