Search results

The "air of danger" type of back that Dorsett and Walker were. Can take it to the house on any given touch.

Never, ever.

That's funny right? Especially when the best chance for him to GET to the Super Bowl was, to not fucking fumble the ball vs. Green Bay.

There won't be a 400 carry RB. With a healthier Romo, they won't be nearly as concerned about running the ball no matter who the RBs on the roster are.

Does anyone think Murray gets even 300 carries, in a Chip Kelly offense? After he gets the big deal and cashes out, does anyone think he is going to beast it like he did last year? I am okay with him leaving. I have to believe that like Dez, Dallas made him a fair offer. But agents have a way...

Also, saw where the Texans are saying they are signing Hoyer - does this mean Cleveland is going with Johnny Futon as their starter in 2015?

I have to call BS on this. Murray's average yards per carry has stayed pretty much the same his entire career. Even when you feed him the ball 400 times. Is this chicken and the egg? Murrary was here before the "strong offensive line" was. So, is his increased production merely the product of...

I track and identify all web crawlers and display them. All sites get these, most though can't ID and display them. The numbers you see of their visits is clickable, and that takes you to a page showing you everything they looked at. It's just a SEO thing.

I was thinking it looked a little tall, myself. But, I really don't see how we keep Murray, if Dez agrees to the long term deal that is still on the table, instead of signing his franchise tender. He's got until what, July to make up his mind? Can we do big deals with both?

I didn't misstate your position at all, I merely articulated it in one sentence instead of a paragraph. But definitely here is our main disagreement. I believe everything we saw last year especially the sudden devotion to the running game, was due mainly to Tony's back troubles. You seem to...

"That's a question: When did he stop being, and when?" --- Paraphrased, the sheriff from "No Country for old Men"

"Continuity."

He's ever had a QB rating for the season, this high? Not anything to the level he used to do. You just don't want to ever acknowledge it was Romo's back surgery which drove everything you saw on offense last year. From the 400 carries for Murray, to the much better decision making by Romo...

Bull Butter. Dude is a lawyer. He eats breakfast 300 yards from judges who are trained to hold him in contempt. You need him in that court, you want him in that court. Message board debates are just a fun hobby for him - I'm just his most recent but well worn kicktoy.

And.... That's probably a good thing. Although, none of these contracts ever pay out close to the announced figure - I do see your point.

Yes speech wasn't the right term. It is however discrimination as much as it would be with the example I gave. Discrimination based on age and class status - freshmen don't get to play on game day, just because they are freshmen? What happened to case by case, no pass no play academic...

That's my own observation that comes from, observation. However he DID say he is more deliberate, while talking about the subject of his back. He is a better QB now, upstairs. And will get even better I predict, with a good offseason of R&R for his back. And proper healing. I never mentioned...

I'm right here with this as well, given the choices and parameters we have. I think he would be worth that.

While I agree with the author's conclusions, I also have additional misgivings about whether this might also be a speech issue. Isn't playing the game, itself a expression of speech? Of course I understand no one has a right to play - the coach ultimately makes that call on a case by case basis...

I should have been clear. I was asking why.