Search results

I haven't been able to find ANYTHING that verifies what was said here. It looks like just random scuttlebutt.

But like Obi-Drunk Jerry recently said, if their projection of 4-5 more years out of Romo comes about, you have a Osweiler situation and with still little clue he's the guy or not. His rookie contract is up and you're stuck. If you take a QB in the top 5 picks of the draft, he is your guy NOW...

I am comfortable chalking up 7 or 8 W's if they stay healthy and play really well. I'd go for 10 or 11 if I could know they're also going to get some good luck. But then, of course it's a one and done playoff team if it gets 10 or 11. Or 12. Or 13.

Plus, he is already a polished pass blocker. Very rare to see that in a back just coming out of college.

Can't say they're not aggressive this draft.

Drew Rosenhaus just dropped Johnny like a bad habit - he now has no agent. Also, he was involved in a hit and run near LA today, was passenger in the run vehicle.

And he is correct. 8-8 is right in between those.

Seems like they really do believe they have a near pat hand. They really do think this is a 12-4 team, without the injuries.

Trump set the trap for himself, and also wasn't prepped to understand this was a unfriendly interview. There's no way to come out of watching that, thinking he'd been well versed on the subject matter. He shot himself in the foot and gave Matthews his second ever "thrill up his leg."

Did you watch the segment? Donald Trump's Hazy Stance On Abortion 'Punishment' | Hardball | MSNBC - YouTube

If you believe human life begins at conception. It's human DNA right? So is sperm, fingernail clippings - you're slaughtering human cells. If they want to risk their health doing abortions as a form of birth control, that's their dumb ass - but not on the public dime. Birth control sometimes...

LOL

Except, there's never been a time in our history when abortion was banned, that the female gets punished for getting one. It's always been the Sot who is illegally providing it, who gets the hammer not the female. Whether that's 'fair' or right or not, is of course debatable. But I would be...

No, Trump first proposed the hypothetical about if Roe v. Wade were overturned, and said there would have to be some penalty if abortion were banned. Matthews then gleefully pounced. That was a completely self-inflicted wound by Trump there.

None, as I said. No matter who was available. Who says they try to adhere to that? I still assert they had no intentions of drafting a RB under any circumstances. And, they did not. Like I did with everlast, I am very amenable to cancelling any such bet with no foul if circumstances warrant...

We all have our wish lists and our favorites. Most of us all agree Zeke would be a nice addition - immediate dangerous back who can run, catch passes and block. A QB at #4 would be a welcome nod to the future. But what's really NEEDED, I think most of us agree - is some DL help. We need a PASS...

Nope, he can't.

But I am confident I know what won't be going on with it. Just like the RB deal last year. I said they wouldn't draft one at all, but if so it would be only in the late rounds. And they didn't draft one. At all. This time my contention is they won't be drafting a QB at #4 no matter who is...

You're taking the bet, or not. It's a simple bet. You either believe they take a QB at #4 if the one they want is there, or you don't. You have your prediction as your signature. You have been saying you think they will take Wentz. You see that, I see that, most every fan sees that, but I don't...

We absolutely, positively, have to come up with QB pressure - because our secondary sucks ass. That is by far the #1 priority IMO. However I would not be against taking Zeke at #4, but I think it is possible he will still be there when our second round pick comes. I'd love it if they took Wentz...