Search results

Except for when he talked about Garrett as a great coach...

Yep poor ole Romo the 100 million dollar man is completely blameless for 10 years of failure. It's all on the organization, the coach, the assistants, the ball boys, the fucking cheerleaders - always something. Pick sixes in the 4th quarter? Happened only because the sorry defense couldn't hold...

DING!!! By that same token, Danny White should be in, right? The HoF gets less relevant as the years march on.

I didn't say anything about what I believe, I only spoke of what I know - most all sports writers, pundits, football show talking heads, play-by-play and color people, all say Romo's a shoo-in. I don't agree with them, never said I did. But the fact is Romo IS widely considered a shoo-in. Those...

Did you miss the "what's considered" part? or just decide to ignore it? Like him or not, agree with it or not, Romo IS considered a shoo-in for the HoF. Romo had good years, with the team finishing 8-8 anyway. What's your point?

Garrett now has a entire offseason to ruin Dak, which he will. But, your faith is amazing considering we're basically 8-8 the last 20 years, and enjoyed the last 10 years with what's considered a shoo-in hall of famer QB named Romo. This team failed to win anything of any real significance, WITH...

8-8 is about all I can muster after the coach of the year had Dak spike the ball, wasting a down, and leaving Aaron Rodgers plenty of time to do us in. What, did you sleep through that?

We start early, with the hall of fame preseason game vs. the Cards. Cowboys, Cardinals to meet in 2017 Hall of Fame game | NFL | Sporting News

Science Deniers! Chromosomes are REAL, it's settled science!

The reason the "trolls" wondered aloud if you were throwing Romo under the bus, idiot - is because unless you can give up who you're comparing Dak to when you were heaping your praise about coolness, composure, and so on - the natural question on any intelligent person's mind is "as compared to...

His DWI couldn't have had anything to do with his eventual draft spot. Right?

"Actively seeking." Is there another kind?

LOL

"Romo-friendly" for years is why we have a shit defense. "Dak-friendly" would be, building the fucking defense.

Yep me too. Although i really would like to see a situation where we can keep him, i have this niggling feeling we're going to NEED a qualified backup QB of Romo's caliber, as the season wanes next year.

What are the effects on the cap if we restructure his deal now? Give him 10 million up front? Then can still cut him and still have the cap savings?

Some of us (only one really, me) hated those deals even before they were signed.

Name a couple that compare to this bullshit one, of Romo knocking them out of the playoffs. First we have to GET to the playoffs again - after a full offseason of Garrett and Wilson fucking Dak totally up, then we gotta have Romo also get to the playoffs with another NFC team. It ain't happening...

Pretty confident there, ain't ya? That we'll make the playoffs again any time soon? LOL Romo won't eliminate shit. When has he ever done that, actually.

But really, if you're wearing your purely business hat and eschew your man-love for Romo, Jerry, this is what you would do. KEEP him on into camp and preseason and wait for some team to lose its starter and thus be truly desperate for a veteran QB. Much like what happened with Minnesota last...