Search results

The number is ALWAYS going to have 9 as its first digit. Not 239

I didn't give you any opinions. I explained what "hidden" holding means, which IS what you asked.

I never said anything like that. In fact I said just the opposite. I see now your problem is either lack of reading, or lack of reading comprehension.

Or how about, just OPEN those frikkin doors to get the magnifying glass effect out of the equation.

Yep if you're on PC look in the addressbar, in mobile it might be easier to use the "share" link they have, to get that number. But all we need here is the number, not the whole URL of the tweet.

Romo during the game Sunday even commented on it, saying Tyron Smith's more blatant holding is him compensating for his bad back. And the stats lend credence to that - before he was hurt you never saw him get called for holding. Because beast that he is, he never had to bearhug or horse collar.

You mean Hall of Famer Johnny Walker GM? With fucking Jerry Jones in the HoF as a contributor and Brandt not, that tells you all you need to know about that category.

It's not legal, it's just the difference in what they look for. When refs started showing up at training camp telling them what they look for? I don't know specifically when this all developed but even back as far as the 70s through the early 80s when I was playing ball they taught us how to get...

Every training camp, the league sends officials to every team where they explain what generates calls. For offensive holding the standard is blatant/obvious holding. The bearhugs, arm bars, jersey grabs where the jersey stretches, the horse collars, stuff that is very easy to see. Offensive...

The difference between what the refs can easily see and what they can't easily see. It's basic stuff, you have blatant obvious holding and you have subtle, "hidden" holding. Watch o-line play more closely.

In order to include Romo in that, he HAD to move the goalposts by discarding those pesky turnovers.

If hall of famers is the meter. If making the team and contributing is the meter, the Dallas '75 draft tops them all easily. We're talking Hall of Famer Randy fucking White, Bob Breunig, Pat Donovan, Mike Hegman, Herb Scott, Scott Laidlaw...

Let's not forget the "Dirty Dozen" draft of 1975. THAT is the greatest of all time.

In the contributor category how can you really even HAVE that, if Brandt's not in it?

He makes good decisions most every time, and truly keeps protecting the ball among his highest priorities.

Bull shit, we want them to be keying on him, makes the play-action work! It's kind of the whole point to having a dominant, dangerous RB.

He's definitely not sneaking up on anyone, they're keying on him now.

Read a interesting stat, from Strum.

Did I not acknowledge that a long time ago, and again today? Of course it's strange, but it doesn't a x-files nutbar conspiracy support. I explained what I think is most likely, a combination of happenstance and the opponent being quite a bit better at hiding their holding than we are. Every...

Our record was. But we were NOT getting pressures, sacks or turnovers. In these areas we've clearly improved, and these ARE the areas that have come up lacking in the big games, where we would eat shit and die.