Search results

Well we got one of those under our belt at least.

Then they're simply irresponsible and incompetent. Had four years of cheap QB money and squandered it by not getting a real one in here.

Except, I've kept up with and have correctly related what you've said. You're lost in your own woods now.

You can lie about what was posted all you want. Doesn't change it any.

Optimism. Hallmark of the Cowboys fan!

It was widely reported by reliable sources not getting the info from Dallas. Asked and answered, you're just going in circles now. Stupid is as stupid does.

3-13?

Your fantasy idea of it doesn't. It's only ASSUMED to exist, outside of that.

Not completely sold but offering upwards of 110 mil for four years. Ell Ohh Ell.

It's night and day between now and the past few years. Obviously. Nothing good, but nothing even near as bad as this.

Nothing I posted is an example of "tanking." There are idiots who believe it though.

Putting aside the silliness of them even being able to evaluate QB talent, if they weren't sold on him they would have let him test the market. They're wishy-washy and just want him on the cheap? No. They love him and won't let him leave as long as he is physically good to go.

They're nonsense. That's why. You didn't even mention Gruden letting Mack go. You might almost have a case there. But hey - Jimmy trading Hershel? Surely that was "tanking" no?

No man, can you not read for context at all? You asked: "Can you name 1 player that Jerry wanted to keep and didn’t sign" And hell yeah, he wants to keep ALL of them, because he falls in LOVE with them!

LMAO. They fielded a really poor team that had been getting more poor by the year. Surprised you're not saying Schramm wanted to fire Landry, so he and our draft guru intentionally gave him terrible talent. They wanted Aikman, and somehow knew he was going to still be alive come draft day, and...

Pretty much all of them. You can keep thinking that, but the fact of the matter is - they love him. They think he is by far the best QB in the league. There's no way they are letting him leave and there's no way they draft an obvious replacement. Health issues excepted of course. They'll deal...

But dude... We're breaking records of bad from the 40s and 50s now. Not just recent ones.

Please give one example of it happening in the NFL. Really. 1989 Cowboys?

Even stupider than that - bitching about expenditures already budgeted. It's not like we dipped into some emergency fund for the flyovers. LOL

Sure did not. Context is key. Nonsense. Money wasn't the issue, the checkbook was open. Dak's handlers didn't want a shorter deal than 5 years. It was all about positioning him for the even bigger payday down the road. Getting that one extra bite of the guaranteed moneypie.