Search results

Great post! You are right on target!

It makes perfect sense if you know what morals are. Its quite obvious you dont, so yea, it would probably not make sense to you.

Romney and McCain both blew it. Neither should have lost but were like limp dicks.

Exactly. Dont let them determine the rules and outcome.

Good. Then Trump should win.

He is probably referring to a barrel with a fire in it that whinos stand around in the winter.

It seemed to be a good move by Jerry, especially after the team turnaround after he booted Wade. But it didnt take long to realize it was just another Jerry hire like Campo, Gailey or Wade. Except in this case, probably even worse than those 3.

I think you are overrating the experience factor for him. With his background and lifetime around football its unfathomable that he would make some of the bonehead gaffes that he has. A lifetime in football and a person just doesnt make some of the gaffes he has. If he didnt have it by then...

Laws are not morals. So because they may change over time doesnt mean that morals are changeable or subjective. Laws can be based on morals, but are NOT morals. And yes you are missing it entirely. You apparently do not know what morals are. You are confusing an application of morals or...

Once again you are missing the point. People and societies dont determine morals. They choose to adhere or not adhere to them. Morals arent changing. Morals arent subjective. Morals are absolutes.

There isnt one thing

Clap spit clap clap spit clap spit clap clap clap spit

Yep. These Belichick and Landry comparisons are ridiculous. What has Garrett shown in any phase of the game to indicate he will ever have any success?

But then we wont reap the rewards and end up just like the Browns. :rofl

How different would the roster be if this team spent as much time on players they could draft in the 7 rounds of the draft every year rather than trying to find steals with UDFA's and PS players who are just fill ins, backups, and role players at best?

People and societies do not determine or establish morals. They choose to adhere to them or they choose not to. Because a certain segment of a society at a certain time in history burned witches doesnt mean it was morally right at that time.

You're confusing issues. Morals are absolute, not subjective. Self defense is not murder. Bin Laden, Sadaam, capital punishment, all are different than murder. There is a penalty being paid for crimes committed. Now maybe Sadaam is a different scenario in the way it was carried out, but...

Maybe if Dexter Manley is living under the same overpass.

The 3 ring circus in Dallas, monkeys, Jerry, and all the other nonsense, its a wonder they win the games they do. Its no wonder why they dont win anything meaningful.