Search results

1) How does McCray get beat deep despite having a 20 yard head start? 2) How the hell does Ernie Sims get a concussion on a touchback? 3) Why does bbgun focus on negative things after a big win?

yet they pitched a shutout today. I mean, the Bucs do have some weapons.

I had to take a shower. Now I'll just sit back and wait for David to tell me what to think about this game.

wild game. it'd be a shame to lose it.

Giants are a weird team. No way the erratic Falcons are 34 points better than them.

Remember a few weeks ago when everyone was ganging up on Shanahan for basically giving up on the season?

Browns were the perfect team to play sans Griffin.

Weeden should buy an assault rifle and kill himself

Do people think that Stealers is still cute?

They'd do what the Syrian and Libyan rebels did: ask for US help.

Many cities in this country have buyback programs. They're not coercive, so most gun owners have no problems with it.

Every other story has said that he left the .223 rifle in the car. Additionally, if he had been firing a .223 the coroner most likely wouldn't be finding any bullets in the bodies because they would have gone in one side and out the other. In any event, the gun he used was incidental. We need to...

So you're a gun-grabber. I'm glad we cleared that up. BTW, you have no right to know why a gun owner "needs" this or that weapon, nor are gun shop owners required by law to ask such a question. So if you ban glocks and the majority of crimes end up being committed with Smith & Wessons, are we...

Like I said, you're for eradication, not "control." Banning guns not only is unconstitutional, in a free society it would be no more effective than banning drugs, and truly would leave guns only in the hands of criminals who prefer something a little stronger than a Smith & Wesson. I'd no sooner...

? Not even sane, ultra-responsible people are allowed to have machine guns. Ditto grenades, dynamite, plastic explosives, howitzers, etc.

Not really. Tyrannical governments are as prevalent today as they were 1776, and the need for personal self-defense is timeless.

Sorry, but you can't inconvenience responsible gun owners or deprive them of their Constitutional rights just because others (criminals) might abuse that privilege. Same with speech. All you'd accomplish is a thriving black market for the weapons that you've banned.

"Gun control" means keeping guns out of the wrong hands, not eradicating or confiscating presently legal classes of weapons. What makes no sense to you (assault rifles) might make perfect sense to someone else. There are people who want to eradicate porn or violent video games, but that pesky...