Search results

I remember hearing/reading the same thing about the agent(s) re-negging on their contract agreement. Dak was screwed but it's his fault too. But you also rely on your representation in these types of situations. Just horrible.....

Yeah....just dumb. He would have been one of the highest paid QB's in the league and he could have made a shit ton more in endorsements. And the way the league and contracts are run now, had he been great (or even good), the Cowboys would have extended him prior to the end of his contract...

Good post Scot and I feel the same way. Fuck Dak's agents. I'd bet the offer on the table was fair and if the hold up was the extra year, well that's pretty dumb when you're the QB in Dallas. Money would have rolled in from outside endorsements left and right. Idiots.

It's sickening David. If he comes back I'd bet Jerry is going to sign him because Jerry gets attached to his players. If Dak hadn't lost all leverage before, he certainly has now but I'd bet Jerry is going to be more than generous.

And while we're at it, I'll add that I don't think Dalton is an upgrade over Dak. He might be a good back-up for a game or two, but I don;t think he's a guy to carry the team and I'm not so sure he can put up enough points on the board to overcome this defense. And I've said it before and...

Laz, I'm not sure what we're debating about. Saying a running QB is more susceptible to injury is not really all that debatable. If I say that a QB who throws 50 times a game is statistically more apt to throw an INT than a QB who throws 20 times a game, that's pretty obvious. Maybe you...

What does "smh" mean?

This is a quagmire for sure. Dak is done for the year. Tag him again next year? Will he be ready? I don't think you can sign him long term until you see how it affects him, both mentally and physically. Dak gambled early in the season last year and lost. He gambled again and didn't accept...

Your odds of injury increase dramatically if you're a running QB. It's not a hard concept. Sure an injury could happen in the pocket. But the risk is greater when you run on a designed play.

He might start next week if he heals quickly......it's a game day decision.

Running QB's run a greater risk. I mean, he injured it on a designed running play. In any event, Dak not signing the contract is going to loom large. I'd bet he's beating himself up over it while lying in his hospital bed. No fucking good......

You guys know I'm not his biggest fan but I would never advocate losing him to injury. I know this has been discussed before but every one of these running QB's run this risk but Dak was big and strong and got away with it. I'm feeling sick to my stomach for him. It's a career altering injury...

That's why you sign the contract and I wish he would have, to be honest. I hate to see that.

That's why I don't like running QB's

Hate to see that. That could be season ending....

The defense sucks. That's a given. I'm not going to argue with you about Dak during the game but he's been inconsistent. It's what drives me crazy about him. But we're moving the ball so maybe things will change.

Not sure but I'd bet he can throw a screen......

Is it to early to enter the Trevor Lawrence sweepstakes?

I wonder if our guys will say after the game they knew what plays the Giants were going to run. You know, since they saw Garrett for 10 years. Something tells me our guys are fucking stupid.