Search results

Gruden didn't trade anyone, the Raiders GM did, reportedly because those two players have the same agent and that GM didn't like the agent. The GM was fired.

You didn't "simplify" anything, you just modified the argument. If you believe we're losing no matter what, then of course the opponent doesn't matter. But that's not what the debate topic was. The debate was, who do you think we have a better chance against, and you said Philly. Unable to...

You don't wanna see them in the playoffs either. Smart man.

Third different thing you've said, as the reason "the opponent doesn't matter." Backpedaling and wiggling the goalposts around, trying to fit that illogical square peg into the rational round hole. When the fact is, the opponent DOES matter. A lot. Especially when one is very familiar with you...

Just like the Giants in 07. We swept them then they beat us in the playoffs. Things have changed in Philly. It's not anywhere near the team it was. Perhaps you haven't been watching them. I'd much rather see Seattle. Don't want to see Philly.

Yeah well, it DOES make a difference who the playoff opponent is and it DOES matter the venue. It's the playoffs. And you can win playoff games and still not dominate them.

Liking our chances at home against a certain opponent and trusting them is two entirely separate and distinct things. I don't "trust" them at all. Just like their chances at home vs Seattle. DON'T like the chances if it's Philly.

Actually I like our chances at home vs Seattle. But beyond that, no bet.

As reported during the game by Pam Oliver.

Yeah, Nawlins will be primed for us after what we did to them, and they'll be coached up and ready for it if we bring kamakze again. I predicted Philly would get better, immediately upon learning Wetz was done. Dbair called me insane or some other such shit. What he and many don't seem to see...

I recused myself, dunno who the actual winner is yet. Only reasoned out the only way we would have any chance at all was to attack completely kamakze style, but wasn't sure Ginger would listen to Richard. Just guessed right on that one. Also guessed right that it was a one-game only plan and not...

None are. The best in the league this year is 12-15 from 40-49 yards. Our guy is 7-11. Ranking tied at 6th best in that range. Out of 32. Employed kickers now, not counting all the unemployed ones you want.

How many kickers are automatic inside 45 yards? How many of those have we missed this year vs. Bailey last year? Veteran kickers available who can be automatic inside 45, can consistently get you touchbacks on kickoffs, but don't have a job for some reason? Would it shock you to learn we have...

Surely you jest. Who you gonna take a bigger risk on, to bring in?

To tell you the truth I'm more skerred of the Egals than I am of Seattle.

99.

Hard to ever know that, when we "take what they give us" and just not even try to challenge doubles. I had this exact gripe when it was happening over and over to Dez. We just don't adjust and don't try, we just let them take a guy out of the game. Contrast that to when teams tried this same...

How many think we probably shit the bed next week now? After this frantic finish?

That was the whole point of playing the starters. As I predicted last week. Gotta have that 10 wins.

387 yards, 4 touchdown passes, no picks. And we have a putrid quarterback?