Search results

We're putting up SOME resistance and at least making good solid, clean tackles. There's hustle too.

I say that then we get two drops from Lamb

Offense lookin spiffy early on

That's a good question. I had the J&J shot back in late March.

Goodness, that's an old one. A little dustoff and name dropping and it returns like Victor Frankenstein's monster.

Not only is that the real question it's actually the entire JJ goal every season.

Most people I talk to in RL and what I see online, all think TB is just gonna walk all over us and that's a fair view. But I think we do pretty well and might even win. SB hangover is real, and I think some of that plus rust plus our new D might give us a chance to make it/keep it ugly and pull...

Exactly. And this allows vaxxed people to still carry and transmit the virus. Convinently . It's a pre-treatment. Makes handy typhoid Mary's out of millions. All the other bullshit is all about the effectiveness and time duration of the pretreatment, NOT about any sort of immunity.

Belechick complained about that, telling a presser that they should be asking why vaxxed players are still able to catch and transmit the virus. Instead of worrying whether Newton's lack of vaxx was why he was cut. He said they're seeing no difference between non vaxxed and vaxxed players where...

If it were actually beer

Same here

I like what I've seen out of the new D. Stopping people seems to be a priority now. Simple setup, the players aren't confused. Few missed tackles even by the scrubs. Lots of good hustle. LBs able to play downhill and lined up deeper than either last year's mess orrrrr the Tampa 2 allows. Feels...

I WANNA say 3-14. But it will be more like 11-6 behind an alarmingly improved defense.

I wanna say 3-14.

The FACTS indicate it's true. The vax does not cause our immune system to KILL the virus. It still allows us to catch it and transmit it. All these "vaccines" do is inhibit activity by the virus, helping us not become gravely ill. They do NOT make us immune! It's a PRE-TREATMENT. It gives NO...

Just what I've been pointing out. It's a pre-treatmemt, not a vaccine. Which begs the question why. Almost like we don't want to kill the thing or prevent its spread. Almost like we're not trying to actually eradicate it. Almost like we like that it kills the old, sick and weak. Just like...

They don't provide ANY immunity. At any point. Is the point.

This virus is a eugenicist's dream come true. And so we engineer "vaccines" that do not kill the virus, and do not prevent or even inhibit transmission. For the first time in the history of virology? In the history of medicine?

I found it ironic today, John Gill meeting with the Ukraine president and one of the topics was corruption in Ukraine.