So much anger and vitriol over an unknown (Escobar) and a barely known (Hanna).
I see him as a complement to Witten but not a successor. He doesn't appear fast or nimble enough to be a true #1. Maybe more of a red zone threat than a "move the chains" guy. Of course, all of this is ridiculously...
da fuk? most of those clips are several years old. I even spotted Tashard Choice for God's sake. and fuck the guy who uploaded a grainy, standard def(!) clip from the Steelers game.*
* no reflection on you, middy
Meh. "We played 'em close!" is loser talk. The fact that we lost three Super Bowls in the 1970s by a total of 11 points does not make me feel any better.
Big deal. We pick up a veteran linebacker every other year and it never makes a significant difference. God help us if you're counting on Detroit's castoffs.
That I never suggested. Sorry if it came off that way. I fully concede that we have talent, just not championship caliber talent. I just think that if given a choice between Rob Ryan and the '85 Bears or Kiffin and the current Dallas defense, Red and Jerry would opt for the former.
I don't think there's much to learn about the pro game if you already have talent (see: Barry Switzer). Not sure JJ coached football any differently in '92 than he did in '89. Training camps were brutal all through his reign.
wishful thinking. they will not be able to compensate for a lack of Super Bowl-type talent on defense. Jimmy Johnson and Wannstedt were just as smart in 1989 as they were in 1992, but they didn't win. why? not enough talent. 2013 will be no different.
Witten took the blame for his good buddy, claiming he didn't continue his route or something. A day later, the brotha receivers complained that Tony only throws to white guys.
It's amazing how many fans keep citing that as a point in his favor. Every year since 1967, two head coaches who never went to Princeton have led their team to a Super Bowl. Some have even done it repeatedly. How did the big dummies manage it?