Search results

How can you say we would solidified the o-line for years with a guy (Konz) who has never completed a full college season because of injury?

Its not late you can still give him your money.

George Zimmerman had $200,000 support fund, attorney acknowledges By Richard Fausset April 27, 2012, 9:16 a.m. Last week, George Zimmerman's family told a Florida judge that they had very little money with which to help the alleged murderer make bond. But as it turns out, Zimmerman had in...

I don't see Chapman as a upgrade over Brent, but yeah I would have liked to have taken another developmental guy at DE, that guy from Tenn was intriguing in the 5th.

I think the o-line value went way down after the 2nd round, I could have taken another DL in the 4th but Wilber seems to have been good value at that spot. I don't think the team thinks Brent is the scrub most make him out to be I like him better than Ta'amu and Thompson.

Its shocking because they don't. We had a above average run defense last year and this guy by all accounts is a good run defender, size is not the end all.

Touche. lol

I never said we gave Scandrick a good deal, I was pointing out the fact that we would not be trading a 5 year 27 million dollar contract so your argument about him being hard to move was way off base.

Mad at you WTF? Do you see me getting upset with Mid and I have disagreed with with him about that case much more than you.

Am I being a dick? I thought the posters liked to mix it up a bit around here.

Scandrick will be paid less than 3 million a year after this season his contract will not be hard to move. But please find some other nonsensical reason to be upset.

From all indications Garrett did like Bennett he never cut his playing time and was always saying how valuable he was to the team. He also was saying they would try and bring him back as free agent when everybody was saying he would not get a offer from the team.

The Giants have a very good O-line? They gave up more sacks than us and had a worse running game, the giants are a great example of a team overcoming a patch work o-line. The Giants have a superior system in place and don't rely on having stacked units on the offensive side of the ball...

Witnesses also saw Zimmerman on top of Martin and we have no idea if Martin has defensive wounds as well, All of the evidence has not been produced but none of the evidence so far proves Zimmerman was attacked. Is it impossible for a person to attack somebody and still have defensive wounds?

My point was that Irvin was a thug who in this day and time would have as many red flags as Jenkins would you not take him on your team? We had a whole team of Jenkins type in the 90's do you feel we should have drafted differently?

My point is why do some people keep saying Martin"attacked" Zimmerman when there has been no evidence to support this assertion. Zimmerman having cuts on his head is not proof he was "attacked".

What? You can be shot and still have other injuries from a fight, it seems everybody who says Martin "attacked" Zimmerman are using his injuries as proof without having any idea about Martins injuries.

Why are you so certain Trayvon was the attacker? Is it because Zimmerman was injured? Do you have proof Martin was not injured as well?

He did not have a criminal record but he did a lot of the same things Jenkins did just watch the documentary The U. Are you really ignoring every thing he did in Dallas of the field because he did not have a criminal record in college?

So you would have never drafted Irvin if you knew his background right?