Search results

Clearly you're emotional about it. However saying he didn't want any of them is just silly. I won't even respond to that with a rebuttal. Its just wrong. Edit: Also.. i just read you said he "set Dallas back years". lol lol lol

Because he'd have little to no trade value at all and he's more valuable right here where he's at. He won't be going anywhere. Take that to the bank.

You all are aware that there are rules and guidelines that you have to follow when issuing your verdict as a juror, right? Its not just like "i feel like she did it today, so.. GUILTY!"

Yea, ERA is all the way up to 2.92 now.

I was just explaining that even if what he said was true (which its not), Romo STILL wouldn't be here had BP not been here.

He's not that great a coach imo. I'd give him one more year there and if nothing changes.. ship him out. Year one was enough of an embarassment already.

The mother not reporting the death.. does not conclude that the mother killed or hid the dead body. As you said.. she was convicted of misleading police.. and rightfully so. That was the only part that was black and white. We all are pretty sure she was either involved or directly...

You most certainly can put Ware, Newman, and Romo in there because they were all brought in under BP's reign. Don't care what the rumor mill says bud. Even if Parcells didn't make every selection on his own, he brought his guys in here to help him out with that stuff. You say Romo was ALL...

There was no evidence proving that the mother was the one that hid her.

Shannahan ran a circus last season.. please don't compare him to BP. Nothing like that has ever happened to one of BP's teams. That environment he created in DC last year was a complete joke. He and his son.

You do know they had no outside information of what happened in the case right? No media reports or anything. They were told to make their ruling based on the evidence presented.. as are all jurors.

If we gave Barry Switzer the 2002 Dallas Cowboys.. and you think he'd have brought us a super bowl.. please go to the nearest wall and smash your head into it about 20 times. Quickly. For all of us..

A 5 time repeat convicted felon would have gone free in that case as much as the prosectors f'd up.

No.. they had the power to make a sound decision based on only the evidence provided in the trial. The prosecution did a terrible job, they didn't prove anything really.. and the jurors had to find her not guilty. Black and white. I'd bet every dollar i own that she was involved.. i don't know...

She was. She was convicted on 4 counts of lying to police officers. The other charges were aggrivated child abuse and manslaughter.. neither of which was proven either.

lol ..and that's why i rarely pay attention to your posts.

Dude.. the prosecution didn't prove that Casey killed her. Its as simple as that. Calling the jurors douchebags for doing their job isn't going to help it. I agree about the broken legal system.. but you can't make it so that less evidence is required in order to convict someone. There's...

Again.. you have to prove that the mother killed the child to get her on a murder charge. They didn't prove that. You can't say, well the mother went out partying so clearly she did it. It doesn't work like that. There has to be clear evidence. The only thing they are allowed to go on is the...

That's kinda the point. They screen all the jurors. lol You can't decide based on how you feel. If the prosecution fails to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she did it, you have to say not guilty. They sucked and failed to even get close to proving that she did it. The jurors did what they...

Thank you my man. Excellent point here yourself about the structure he gave this franchise.