Search results

Jerry's great grandson will be GM then and it'll have been 118 yrs since they last won a SB.

I do agree that if we take a flier on a guy mainly based on size/speed, then late is the time to it.

We always seem to do this often, draft for measurables late (and sometimes early) rather than just taking football players.

Not at all. But what we did do was trade up for need. They deem CB a major need and used 2 picks to move up for one. You support that? Also, drafting for need and value can be done simultaneously. We could easily have moved just 2 spots to 12 and got Cox who was value there and then Konz in the...

We addressed CB in FA and could've added another in the 3-4 round range. Didn't need to go to top of the draft for another CB while neglecting the OL and interior DL again.

I like Coale. He was one of my pet cat. I think he can come in and be a quality/smart WR for us for sometime.

Makes no sense. We addressed CB with a premium singing in FA. Could've taken DeCastro, even by trading down, and then nabbed Jerel Worthy in the 2nd. Shore up the interior OL and middle of DL for years. Instead we add another CB. I really like Claiborne, but with adding Carr in FA, I take the...

Jerry has always been highly involved with the high round picks, those the average Joe knows about and those he can try and make a splash with. But Jerry has also always relied on others around him for most of the draft since he himself knows nothing about player evaluation. In the first...

This draft will rise or fall on Crawford and Wilber, even if Claiborne turns out to be a Deion/Champ/Revis type corner. We need more than one stud CB on this team right now. As for the selections themselves, most, with the exception of Johnson, went in the area they were projected. Johnson of...

Yeah, and it makes no sense because next year it's a first rounder and you have no pick.

He'll probably move up. Gotta get that TE next. :jerry

I'd be OK with Glenn in a trade down, but not at 14.

He'll probably have it updated in the morning.

I'll take Cox, DeCastro or Barron at 14 and call it a day. But I don't like any of them enough to move up for. If they are all gone then I'd prefer to move down into the late teens. Would rather not have to settle for Brockers or Poe at 14. The problem is if the top three targets are gone and...

1) What pick/s do you love for us at 14? I'm not in love with any of the possible targets, but my top two choices among realistic options are Cox and DeCastro. 2) What pick/s do you feel good about if they were to trade down? Barron, Brockers, Kirkpatrick, C. Glenn. 3) Whats your worst...

Yeah, but after the top 3 are gone he's about as good as any we'd be left choosing from. My preference would be to trade down but if not I'd take the safer pick than the boom/bust guy.

Same here, except I think Brockers would probably get the nod over DeCastro. I think Cox and Barron are the top two targets. DeCastro would likely be the fall back if the other three are gone. Poe though is probably in the mix too. For me, I like: 1. Cox 2. DeCastro 3. Barron 4. Brockers 5. Poe

:awkward

Matt Millen in Dallas now?

Austin360....Star-Telegram...The Ranch...TheCowboys.net...CowboysZone....Cowboys-Forum...CowboysCentral...DCCI...DCCII...DCCIII...DCU