Search results

Trump is a lost cause, David. Dude supports Universal Healthcare.

What if he was open about it? Any chance? To be entirely honest, I'd vote for a gay Rubio before I would vote for Cruz. Cruz has to be the biggest scumbag in politics right now, and I barely even know anything about the guy. All I know is that he looks like someone you wouldn't let watch...

Doesn't mean anything.

FIFY.

Joe Rogan video is kind of weird. Not sure why a person who identifies as a male would even be permitted to go to a female-only university.

Ahh yes, his plight. He was the guy who caught a cross-eyed stare from a filthy browner and was just seconds from shooting him, wasn't he?

Private ownership will cease to exist if Bernie is elected just as it has ceased to exist throughout the rest of the planet.

Socialism ends private ownership over the means of production. Haven't heard any candidate champion that idea. I doubt anyone would even endorse such an idea. The big distinction I guess would be that Democratic Socialism can be 100% in favor of private ownership of the means of production...

Hold on, you got an outside shot with Bernie.....well, in terms of getting the bigger percentage. Doesn't Iowa go proportional on the delegates?

Looks like you're going to lose it all.

Stick to the important questions, please.

When his name is on the ballot, will Ted Cruz's name be "Ted Cruz"? Has he had that legally changed? If not, seems like "Rafeal Edward Cruz" should have to be there as "Ted" is not a contracted form of either Rafeal or Edward. I mean, doubtful a hypothetical race with Bruce Wayne would allow...

Trump's support is kind of interesting in a way. He's more or less said he would attempt to replace Obamacare with Universal Healthcare, and he's said he would raise taxes on the wealthy. 2 positions that gets Bernie Sanders labeled a "socialist". Just reaffirms my belief that the two party...

And America gets the choice of the least shitty candidate.

Kind of an interesting election year. The front runner from 1 party is not the guy the part wants to see get the nomination, and for the other party there's a guy who's making huge gains on the front runner who is also a guy his party does not want to see nominated.

The left could swing the vote without giving legalization to immigrants. Simply get the under-30 populace to vote and they'd win in a landslide until this group shifted right. This group's turnout was 20% lower than the over-30 group in 2012. If it were on par with the over-30 group it would...

What is the grand scheme of things? Seriously, I don't know what you mean by this. I can make some assumptions, but they'd only really be caricature-like statements.

What does this mean?

I told you all this would happen. Nobody likes Hillary. Her support was so high because she was the only candidate people knew about. Just like in 2008, when people are given another option they drop her ass. People don't want another Bush and they don't want another Clinton.

Other than drop like a fucking rock in the polls and shame an elementary kid, I'm guessing not a whole lot. That's why I'm asking. Done, isn't he?