Search results

I was thinking the same thing. I have no trouble believing that Jerry is capable of making a truly horrible pick. But I guess I have more faith in the media. If the 1st round pick was widely seen as a 6th or 7th round value, I think more people would have realized it and reported it ... more...

The idea that several teams may have had him rated as a sixth or seventh round draft pick surprises me. Frankly, it sounds farfetched.

Geeze, hate to say it, but Tebow has Jerry stunt-value. Tebow would generate more merchandise sales.

Darren Sharper, Safety, went to William & Mary. He was on the NFL's 2000s all decade team. ... you never know.

Interesting write-up. Given the realities of last year's OL, I find it difficult to fault Jerry for insisting that the team get a top tier OL. Seemed like an obvious #1 priority to me.

Maybe he was hurt and that's the reason why he wasn't any better, but Vickers' performance last year doesn't exactly argue that he's worth a roster spot. Let's hope the OL is significantly better this year. No offensive philosophy is going to work well without a decent OL ..>.

I've seen many of his games. He's got a great football attitude ... plays with passion. He's a motivational team leader RKG. His weakness is that he's prone to being overpowered. He was just marginally strong enough to be an SEC LB; he got tossed around too much. When encountering pulling...

I'm just as happy that the team didn't add more developmental OL this weekend; I'm not convinced more developmental OL were needed. They already have guys like Arkin, Kowalski, and Leary on the roster .... No point in hitting the restart button just for the heck of it. It would have been...

2 & 14 are the same guy, I'd guess.

I had Déjà vu, too. I like Bob, but we should cut his balls off for starting this thread.

Marty B always seemed to see more passes when Romo was hurt on the bench.

At least this time Jerry didn't sign a few crappy OL veterans and pretend that the team had already addressed its OL needs before the draft.

The big question for me is whether Romo and Red can actually run an offense that gets significant receiving productivity from two TEs.

Is the Ogletree/Dwayne Harris/Beasley cluster of players so bad that Williams is considered to fill an important hole/role in the roster? I'm not an Olgetree fan and I realize that Williams is a different kind of WR than Harris and Beasley, but Harris and Beasley aren't bad. I don't know...

Anyone who can perform like he did in the SEC isn't half bad. This just in ... the SEC is pretty good. (We realize that Wolverines have a blindspot in this regard)

Yeah, that's exactly my take too. And if not a G or S, I think a second RB would bring more value than a second TE. The Cowboys could use a short yardage physical back AND, I hate to break it to everyone, but Murray isn't going to play a 16 game regular season more than two or three times...

I'm not a big fan of drafting the TE position here.

JJT has a point if one assumes that the Cowboys really need a Safety or DT or etc. just as much as the Cowboys need OL. If needs are consistent across position, the Cowboys clearly screwed up. They didn't get as much value out of their picks as they could. But if one assumes that the...

I agree with you on this. And if the team believed its clear #1 priority was OL help, I can see why things happened the way they did last night. That first round didn't set up particularly well for the Cowboys, but the team wasn't as hurt by it as it might have been. If the team has a good...

I feel the same way. I don't want to judge last night in a vacuum. I want to see what happens tonight first.