i'm sure he could do it he'd just be less effective. more prone to jams, the corners can sit on him a bit more because he doesnt have two way gos and they dont have to worry about him burning them or winning jump balls.
pretty sure that's a statement you made up.
what i said was that its dumb to make statements about how China owns us when they own 7% of our debt. i broke alot of shit down though and got back country is in great shape and yuh huh finish carpenters did too make 18 an hour back in 75 so whatever...
Bottom line: to US policymakers, there is in reality NO MEXICO PROBLEM. No immigration problem. No problem at all.
This is a ploy to get people who dislike immigrants to vote.
And they will never never never never do anything about it.
Because it's set up just the way they want it.
Your questions reveal a fundamental misunderstanding of the nation's debt. Like what even is a treasury bond? You are trying to be cute but if you don't even understand that part how can we have an actual conversation about it? With regards to this discussion (immigration) the idea that China...
i dont see any way that changes. look at those tiny arms. he is so little and he has to operate in an area where dudes look like Kam Chancellor. You're gonna drop/fumble a few here and there.
The issue that you seem to be missing is that we are in absolutely no danger of not being able to pay our bills. You clearly don't understand debt on anything more than a household level, which is why you're all over the place with your argument. China isn't a factor. Us not being able to pay...
What does that have to do with our debt to China? I am just tired of hearing that trope. 7%. They own 7%. We own roughly the same dollar amount of THEIR debt, and it's debt they've defaulted on throughout the years. We own most of our own debt. I don't think the people who spout this stuff are...