This weeks thread

Messages
10,636
Reaction score
0
Sheik was right, jaws just said romo is like 43/60 for 600 yards, 5 td's and no picks when we go empty. Spread that shit out

Dez, twill, Beasley, witten, murray
 
Messages
10,636
Reaction score
0
To match him up with a linebacker as the safety valve. Plus you always have the threat of him motioning in to protect, or more hopefully as a runner. I wouldn't even bother with Keeping extra blockers in. It only congests things. They should just spread it out and play romo ball. The offense is too stale otherwise.

Although there is a touch duplicity there with Murray and bEasley. They would have to let dez and twill run deeper.

I just don't think much of Harris a reciever anymore, he's clearly not open too much.
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
3
I'm with you. Callahan used this a lot in Oakland. Do it more here, it's been working.

And I like the no-RB idea. We don't have much of a RB corps anyway. Harris would make a pretty good quasi-RB on short passes -- he's got a little strength and toughness to him.

Even when Murray comes back, it'll only be a matter of time before he's hurt again anyway.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
61,336
Reaction score
11,243
We play to the level of our opponents. We're losers.

Jon that's not true. We are 4-4. Last year we were 8-8. The prior year we were 8-8.

We are mediocres, not losers.
 
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
11
Tangent. How many of you looked at that safety that ended the Bengals/dolphins game and thought: "I recognize that playcalling...and the embarrassing outcome"?
 
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
11
1 RB inevitably flanked out? I agree. I just don't think the 5 wide/no RB scares any team from rushing 6 on Romo and forcing a throw before one of 7 second routes can be completed and then rerouted.
 
Top Bottom