Bales: Jason Witten has already started to decline

Messages
46,859
Reaction score
10
It’s pretty difficult to knock a guy who just broke the single-season record for receptions at his position. Tight end Jason Witten is one heck of a player and a guy anyone would want to have on their team, but he’s actually been in decline for quite some time now.

The Numbers

Yes, Witten hauled in 110 passes in 2012, but that’s due primarily to a massive workload in situations when the Cowboys were forced to throw the football. Of Witten’s 110 receptions, 79 came when the Cowboys were losing and 25 came when the team was tied. That means that Witten caught all of six passes when the Cowboys were winning last year. Six passes!

Bulk stats can be important, but efficiency stats better predict future play. How will Witten perform in 2013 if he sees only 130 targets instead of the career-high 150 he had last season? On a per-catch and per-target basis, Witten actually wasn’t at his best in 2012. His average reception went for just 9.4 yards—a career-low—and he also checked in below seven yards per target. Even on a per-route basis, Witten’s steady decline continued. . .

Jason-Witten-Yards-Per-Route.png


The truth is that Witten didn’t play any better in 2012 than he did in prior seasons—he was actually slightly worse—but he just saw way more opportunities.

What I Like

There are obviously a lot of things to love about Witten. He’s an extremely hard worker who will take care of his body to extend his career as long as possible. He’s always going to be in the right position at the right time, so he can still make up for his shortcomings as an athlete.

What I Don’t Like

What I don’t like about Witten in 2013 is this graph. . .

Jason-Witten-Production.png


Tight end is a difficult position to play. Tight ends taking a pounding over the course of their careers, and it shows once they cross 30. Tight end production has historically peaked at age 29, but the typical drop is a steep one. Heading into his age 31 season, Witten is entering a period during which most tight ends have broken down.

2013 Projection

The first thing we need to do to project Witten is determine how many targets he’ll see. His average over the past four seasons has been 130, and he’ll probably fall just below that range in 2013. If Witten catches 70 percent of, say, 125 targets—not unrealistic considering he hauled in 72.5 percent over the past four seasons—we’re looking at 88 receptions. While Witten will probably improve upon the 9.4 YPR he totaled in 2012, he’s simply not very explosive anymore. At 10.0 YPR, Witten would total 880 receiving yards this season.

For whatever reason, Witten has never been very efficient in the red zone. He’s converted only 5.5 percent of his career receptions into scores, and that number could actually drop with Gavin Escobar in town. When all is said and done, Witten should score somewhere in the neighborhood of four touchdowns.

Final Projection: 88 receptions, 880 yards, 4 TD
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
1
I mean....we weren't ahead last year. We basically used witten as our running game.
 

Hoofbite

Draft Pick
Messages
4,231
Reaction score
0
I mean....we weren't ahead last year. We basically used witten as our running game.

Yeah, what a fucking idiot.

I think Sturm said that Dallas had like 30 minutes of lead time in home games last year.

When you have an OL that can't do shit, you have to throw dump offs all day. That's how Witten go to 110 receptions.

This is purely a case where someone is looking at numbers, disregarding all the context, and then arriving at a conclusion that fits the numbers.

I'd bet anything Witten will have a better YPC this year than last year. Shit goes up and down. He tied his career high in 2011. You would have looked like a dumbass to say he was in decline after 2010 because he was under 11 YPC for the first time since his rookie season.
 

Hoofbite

Draft Pick
Messages
4,231
Reaction score
0
Another thing, looking at "historic" production fails to address the fact that most of history is filled with guys who weren't nearly as good as Witten in the first place.

Historic production says Gonzo should have dropped off like 6000 yards and almost 50 TDs ago. The reason he didn't is because he's fucking better than anyone else in history.

If you're going to compare a guy who's top 3 at his position to everyone else, you better at least acknowledge that a great number of those everyone else's were nobodies to begin with.
 
Messages
4,604
Reaction score
2
12 inches less over a period of 5 years? Sorry, I don't see anything to worry about.

Cue the "that's what she said" jokes.
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
6
I think the idea that if you're behind you can't possibly run the ball is one of the most ridiculous things ever. Sure, if it's 21-0 in the fourth quarter, you better be throwing it. But if it's 7-0 or 10-0 or 13-3 in pretty much anything but the fourth quarter, there's zero reason to abandon the run. That's just another excuse for sucking at it.

And on Witten, I have no doubt he's in decline. Also have no doubt that he'd peak before the average TE, because he came into the league at 20 years old. It's not the years, it's the mileage.

I do think Witten's low redzone production is largely due to Garrett's retarded protection schemes which for some reason seem to almost always have him in to block inside the 15 or so. I don't remember that happening nearly the same way under Parcells.
 

Dodger12

Super Moderator
Messages
7,628
Reaction score
4,761
Yes, Witten hauled in 110 passes in 2012, but that’s due primarily to a massive workload in situations when the Cowboys were forced to throw the football. Of Witten’s 110 receptions, 79 came when the Cowboys were losing and 25 came when the team was tied. That means that Witten caught all of six passes when the Cowboys were winning last year. Six passes!

Wow....that's an incredible statistic but I don't think the Cowboys led all that much last season so those numbers can be a bit deceiving. In any event, I don't think Witten is the same TE he was earlier in his career and you wonder how he would have fared statistically if his buddy Romo wasn't throwing him the rock..
 
Messages
3,665
Reaction score
23
For a guy with a lacerated spleen, he didn't do too bad.

... I'm sure that physically he isn't as good as he once was. He's taken a beating. But he's a resourceful, experienced player who is difficult to defend. He'll be that way until his knees, back, or shoulders give out.
 

jnday

UDFA
Messages
2,680
Reaction score
2
Witten will be productive a little longer due to his ability to get separation. He was never a threat after catching the ball, but he could pick up a few YAC. Now, he gets the ball and gains little to nothing. He has been in decline for a couple of years IMO. He is strictly a safety outlet for Romo at this point of his career. He is no longer a weapon. Another great player and true pro that will waste a career as one of Jerry's toys.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
1
I do think Witten's low redzone production is largely due to Garrett's retarded protection schemes which for some reason seem to almost always have him in to block inside the 15 or so. I don't remember that happening nearly the same way under Parcells.

lets see...we have a TE and QB with and almost other-worldly sixth sense for getting open and knowing what each other is going to do. Romo can fit it into incredibly tight spaces with Witten because he uses his body for positioning so well.

So what do we do in the one region of the field where that would seem to be most useful? Not use it at all.

During 13-3 I remember Bellichick saying he wasn't worried about TO. He knew they had to stop Witten, and take away that down to down comfort zone for Romo. He's the second most important piece of our offense.
 

Ben_in_Austin

Practice Squad
Messages
437
Reaction score
0
That's the stupidest analogy I've ever seen. So, he has the most receptions in a season and you think those are going to be long routes?

:fern
 
Top Bottom