Cowboys think they're built for a 4-3

Messages
46,859
Reaction score
10
Feb 282:28PM CT

By Dan Graziano | ESPNDallas.com


This scouting combine story from Todd Archer tells us that the Dallas Cowboys were planning a switch from a 3-4 defense to a 4-3 defense even before the 2012 season ended. According to coach Jason Garrett, they believe they have the right kind of personnel to make the switch:

"You just go through all those scenarios and at the end of it we felt good about, 'Hey, we can do this and it won't take us three years to do this,'" coach Jason Garrett said. "And we certainly want to continue to add pieces to it and make that defense better, but we felt good about the flexibility and versatility of the guys we already have."

Monte Kiffin and defensive line coach Rod Marinelli agreed with Garrett's analysis after they joined the staff. They used players such as Simeon Rice, Warren Sapp, Derrick Brooks and Brian Urlacher as frames of reference for DeMarcus Ware, Jay Ratliff, Sean Lee and Bruce Carter.​

Well, yeah. I mean, if all of those guys at the end of that sentence play like all of the guys at the beginning of that sentence, then yeah, the Cowboys will really have something. But there are some "ifs," and most of them are tied to health. For instance, I think Lee can be a brilliant playmaking middle linebacker in a 4-3. But he has to stay on the field, and he's had trouble doing that. And then there's this later in the story from former Cowboys exec Jeff Ireland, comparing Ware to Cameron Wake, who moved from a 3-4 outside linebacker to a 4-3 end last year for Ireland's Dolphins:

"We felt like when Wake was in a three-point stance he probably was a better rusher than he was in a two-point stance," Ireland said. "I don't know that about DeMarcus. I'd have to study that, but I'm sure he's equally efficient in a three-point or two-point stance, so I don't think it will be that tough."​

Ware is a very interesting part of all of this. Again, I don't think it's a question of his ability to perform effectively in a 4-3 but rather his ability to hold up physically while playing closer to the ball and mixing it up more directly with bigger offensive line bodies. Ware has shown some signs the past couple of years that his body could be beginning to break down, and if that is a trend and not an aberration, then a move like this isn't going to help with it.

This transition to the 4-3 is one of the very interesting stories of the Cowboys' offseason, so we'll continue to examine it as it goes along. I think they have the right kinds of players to pull it off, but a lot depends on who goes, who stays and who shows up to play it once the salary cap is straight and free agency and the draft have settled.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
8
I don't necessarily believe they have the right personnel for the 4-3 as much as I believe the FO just didn't have what it takes to stock a 3-4 defense.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
1
They used players such as Simeon Rice, Warren Sapp, Derrick Brooks and Brian Urlacher as frames of reference for DeMarcus Ware, Jay Ratliff, Sean Lee and Bruce Carter.

how is a raven like any of this shit

Sapp Brooks and Urlacher are some of the best to EVER play their positions. Only Ware is in that convo. gtfo here
 

Hoofbite

Draft Pick
Messages
4,231
Reaction score
0
Great to know that while trying to build a 3-4 the front office fucked up so much that they actually built a suitable 4-3.
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
209
how is a raven like any of this shit

Sapp Brooks and Urlacher are some of the best to EVER play their positions. Only Ware is in that convo. gtfo here

Did they come into the league and on day 1, being the best to EVER play their positions?
 

BraveHeartFan

Spectator
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I think a DT in a 4-3 is a bit different than a DT in a 3-4. Maybe that's just me but they don't play those positions exactly the same.

Although I agree with you about Glover. I liked him a whole lot better than I like Rat.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
8
I think a DT in a 4-3 is a bit different than a DT in a 3-4. Maybe that's just me but they don't play those positions exactly the same.

Although I agree with you about Glover. I liked him a whole lot better than I like Rat.

They don't. Laz is just trying to slant the situation to make Ratliff look better even though we're talking Rat being the 3-tech in Monte's scheme. The same position LaRoi Glover played here and in St. Louis etc.
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
209
They don't. Laz is just trying to slant the situation to make Ratliff look better even though we're talking Rat being the 3-tech in Monte's scheme. The same position LaRoi Glover played here and in St. Louis etc.

Not at all. Rat is who he is. We haven't seen him in as a 4-3 DT yet. And Glover's last Pro Bowl was with the Cowboys as an NT. You claimed that Glover made All-Pro as an NT, and that was incorrect.

But that's besides the point. Ratliff doesn't have to be as "good" as Glover. If Ratliff can stay healthy, he'll do just fine more than likely.
 
Top Bottom