Bales: Dissecting 10 Interesting Stats For Cowboys In 2012

Messages
46,859
Reaction score
10
The 2012 season is over, but it will be mighty challenging to improve in 2013 if the team doesn’t understand what they did well and poorly last season. Here are 10 unique stats that help tell the story of last year’s Dallas Cowboys:

1. Only the St. Louis Rams had more pre-snap penalties than the Cowboys.

With 58 penalties before the snap of the ball, there’s no doubt that the Cowboys can dramatically improve their 2013 offense simply by playing with more discipline. No player on Dallas committed more penalties than right tackle Doug Free’s 13 (pre- and post-snap).

2. The Cowboys passed 127 times out of 129 plays from “Gun Trips.”

In my breakdown of the Cowboys’ 2012 formations, I mentioned that the team ran the ball only two times from “Gun Trips” all year and only three times since 2009. That wouldn’t necessarily be a problem if the ’Boys used the formation in pass-only situations, but they actually lined up in “Gun Trips” 86 times on first-and-10 (or less), second-and-10 (or less) or third-and-5 (or less). In 2013, it’s possible that defenses will begin to send their pass-rushers after Tony Romo immediately following the snap when they identify the formation.

3. Dallas passed the ball on 66.2 percent of their plays.

Is that rate too high? Most would say yes, but don’t forget that the Cowboys 1) have more success when they throw the ball early in games and 2) were forced to pass often late in their 2012 losses. Romo dropped back to pass on 72.9 percent of the Cowboys’ fourth-quarter snaps, compared to 63.7 percent otherwise.

4. The Cowboys ran only 24 screen passes and six counters all year.

Head coach Jason Garrett has never been a big screen guy, but heading into 2012, I figured the rate of counters would remain steady or even increase from past seasons. The Cowboys averaged 7.2 yards-per-carry on counters from 2009 to 2011, but we saw just six of them last year. It’s possible that the new offensive line personnel was the reason for the decline, but don’t forget the Cowboys ran and had much success on counters with physical interior linemen like Leonard Davis and Andre Gurode.

As far as screen passes, you could very well see more of them next year. Screens could be an effective tool to combat ineffective pass protection. Only eight of the Cowboys’ 24 screen passes in 2012 were to running backs.

5. Tony Romo’s December passer rating was 101.2. It was the same in the fourth quarter.

Heading into the Cowboys’ Week 17 matchup with the Redskins, Romo had thrown 12 touchdown passes to
just one interception in December. There’s no doubt that the quarterback struggled against Washington, but the team wouldn’t have even been in a position to win the division had it not been for Romo’s incredible month. Romo’s poor showing in the fourth quarter was uncharacteristic for someone who has excelled in the fourth quarter in recent seasons.

6. The Cowboys were sixth in the NFL in yards, but only 14th in EPA per play.

Bulk stats are a really poor predictor of future success; many of the league’s worst offenses gain a whole lot of yards late in games simply because they’re losing and are forced to throw, for example. In terms of efficiency (as measured by “Expected Points Added”), the ’Boys ranked just 14th in the NFL. Remember, EPA per play is basically a measure of how much an offense increases the probability of scoring after any given play, and it predicts future offensive success much better than total yards.

7. The rushing offense ranked 18th in the NFL in success rate (40.2 percent).

“Success rate” is a measure of how often an offense increases their chances of scoring on running plays. It’s a better indicator of success than yards per carry (YPC) because it accounts for game situations. A 2-yard run on third-and-1 is a successful play. Success rate captures that, but YPC doesn’t.

Dallas ranked only 30th in the NFL in rushing YPC, but near the middle of the pack in success rate. That suggests Garrett called a lot of runs in situations when gaining a lot of yards on the ground was difficult or impossible, such as on the goal line. That’s a good thing, by the way, and it suggests the Cowboys’ rushing offense, although not really all that good, wasn’t quite as poor as some believe.

8. Romo showed play-action on only 10 percent of his 2012 passes, the lowest rate in the NFL.

I talked about play-action passes a lot throughout the season. The difference between Romo (ranked 38th in the league in play-action rate) and the 37th-ranked quarterback, John Skelton, was greater than the difference between Skelton and the next 11 passers.

Romo’s passer rating on play-action passes was 109.1. His success isn’t unusual; 30 of the 38 quarterbacks who took at least 25 percent of their offense’s snaps had higher yards-per-attempt on play-action passes as compared to straight dropbacks.



9. Anthony Spencer rushed the passer on only 64.9 percent of his pass snaps.

It might seem like Spencer is used as a rusher all of the time, but he actually dropped into coverage on more than one-third of his 2012 pass snaps. You can expect that to change in 2013 if Spencer remains in Dallas as a 4-3 defensive end.

10. Dez Bryant was fourth in the NFL in deep receiving yards and second in deep touchdowns.

Here, a “deep” pass is one that travels at least 20 yards past the line of scrimmage. Despite his success, Bryant ranked just 17th in the league in deep targets, primarily because he saw only one deep target in the Cowboys’ first three games and just four deep targets in the first six. If there’s one way the offense can improve in 2013, it might be finding more ways to get the ball to Bryant downfield.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
10
If you can read #2, #3, #4, #6, and #8.... and still think Jason Garrett is the answer, then you're hopeless.

Smart offensive mind, my ass.
 
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
0
Running on 66 percent...holy shit, that is terrible. I know the injuries to Murray and Jones played a part, but you have to give it more of a try than that.
 

Iamtdg

2
Messages
5,614
Reaction score
0
Running on 66 percent...holy shit, that is terrible. I know the injuries to Murray and Jones played a part, but you have to give it more of a try than that.

That coupled with the middle of the pack rushing success rate (another reason to use it more) and only 10% of our passes came off of play action. These are like Madden stats. Ridiculous.
 
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
0
No reason to really run playaction though when you don't run the ball enough for the D to take it seriously. Having a legit #2 behind Murray is imperative this year. Murray's running style lends itself to injuries.
 

Iamtdg

2
Messages
5,614
Reaction score
0
No reason to really run playaction though when you don't run the ball enough for the D to take it seriously. Having a legit #2 behind Murray is imperative this year. Murray's running style lends itself to injuries.

Exactly. They should have been doing both so that the play action would be more effective. And then they should have used play action more often.
 

Theebs

Quality Starter
Messages
8,534
Reaction score
0
No reason to really run playaction though when you don't run the ball enough for the D to take it seriously. Having a legit #2 behind Murray is imperative this year. Murray's running style lends itself to injuries.

we need an entirely new running perspective and personnel.

tackle, guard, center, fullback and maybe two more backs.

Broaddus insists callhan is installing a physical running game this year and that is what he wanted last year.

the funny thing about the play action is Romo threw a bunch of TD's on play action. If we can ever get the running game going it could be huge for this team.

how do you get the running game going though? In one offseason I dont see how we can rebuild it unless all of our resources into offense and then we will just get outscored.....

blowing repeated drafts really is a bummer. I wish they would just buckle down and rebuild the line and build a running game this offseason though. Even though our time of possession is good it might help keep our perpetually shitty defense off the field in the 4th qtr....we could win games like the ravens loss this year, the pats loss last year, the giants loss in 11...etc....having to throw in the 4 minute drill with a lead sucks.
 
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
0
Also, we made a decision to go with more athletic OL for the most part, yet we run no counters or screens to take advantage of the supposed increased mobility of the OL.

F Garrett in the A.
 

Theebs

Quality Starter
Messages
8,534
Reaction score
0
Also, we made a decision to go with more athletic OL for the most part, yet we run no counters or screens to take advantage of the supposed increased mobility of the OL.

F Garrett in the A.

I think that has more to do with costa being injured. Cook could not move and when mack played there for two games dockery couldnt move. I also do not believe livings moved out in space very well.

hopefully they can get a group together and keep them healty next season.
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
209
Also, we made a decision to go with more athletic OL for the most part, yet we run no counters or screens to take advantage of the supposed increased mobility of the OL.

F Garrett in the A.

Yeah. LOL. Especially when going up agaisnt the more agressive defenses, when it would have made total sense to run screens.
 

Hoofbite

Draft Pick
Messages
4,231
Reaction score
0
I can't wait until Sturm does a decoding Garrett for the entire time he's been in Dallas.
 
Messages
3,665
Reaction score
23
we need an entirely new running perspective and personnel.

tackle, guard, center, fullback and maybe two more backs.

Broaddus insists callhan is installing a physical running game this year and that is what he wanted last year.

the funny thing about the play action is Romo threw a bunch of TD's on play action. If we can ever get the running game going it could be huge for this team.

how do you get the running game going though? In one offseason I dont see how we can rebuild it unless all of our resources into offense and then we will just get outscored.....

blowing repeated drafts really is a bummer. I wish they would just buckle down and rebuild the line and build a running game this offseason though. Even though our time of possession is good it might help keep our perpetually shitty defense off the field in the 4th qtr....we could win games like the ravens loss this year, the pats loss last year, the giants loss in 11...etc....having to throw in the 4 minute drill with a lead sucks.

I agree.

Clearly the Cowboys have a lot of needs. As I've been saying for the last couple of years, my general strategy would be to load up on offense and hope that the Cowboys offense could control the clock and/or manage to outscore opponents.

It isn't a perfect plan, but then, no plan is perfect under the present circumstances ....
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
8
No reason to really run playaction though when you don't run the ball enough for the D to take it seriously. Having a legit #2 behind Murray is imperative this year. Murray's running style lends itself to injuries.

Or we could load up on TEs. I'm being serious here.

We also need to bring back the delayed draw. That did a great job of freezing up the LBs.
 
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
14
If you can read #2, #3, #4, #6, and #8.... and still think Jason Garrett is the answer, then you're hopeless.

Smart offensive mind, my ass.
#7 as well. The team could have done a lot more running than it did. This coach does not feel that he has to add anything more to his plays than what they are on the chalkboard. He thinks that a vanilla formation will "deceive" the defense enough to decipher what stunt or coverage they are attempting. So even when there was Davis or Gurode, the running plays were diminishing and last year saw the fewest called in over 12 years. It never hurts to try playaction, even if running is improbable, because there is always a chance that it will give the defense pause. What happened to the draws, the screens, the counters? They are obviated by Jason's naïve arrogance, like the use of trick or gadget plays or unusual formations or even motio; it all comes down to Jason's original design and playcall is and should be enough: if only the offense would execute and the defense would lack any athleticism or cognition. I've never heard of a coach who did not believe in usuaing deception, unpredictability, or any advantage possible to get the team to score and then, win.
 
Top Bottom