GloryDaysRBack

Quality Starter
Messages
5,080
Reaction score
0
Nobody died. Why the fuck would we ban knives?

Guns on the other hand actually kill people
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
If one of them died, or if one of them does end up dying... you'd be an advocate of banning knives, right?
 

GloryDaysRBack

Quality Starter
Messages
5,080
Reaction score
0
If one of them died, or if one of them does end up dying... you'd be an advocate of banning knives, right?

most definitely.

Then when someone starting killing people with their shoes, we must ban those too
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
If the gubment wants to ban stuff that gets people killed, then they need to start with alcohol.

No... I'm not advocating banning alcohol.
 

JBond

UDFA
Messages
2,667
Reaction score
2
If the gubment wants to ban stuff that gets people killed, then they need to start with alcohol.

No... I'm not advocating banning alcohol.

Maybe we should ban fat people from eating crap. Only allow them to buy vegetables. The fatties are costing us a ton of money and hardship.
 

Minimalist

Practice Squad
Messages
193
Reaction score
0
If the gubment wants to ban stuff that gets people killed, then they need to start with alcohol.

No... I'm not advocating banning alcohol.

That's been one my arguments for a while. If its truly about "saving just one life" ban alcohol and cigarettes. See how that goes for you.
 

VTA

UDFA
Messages
2,500
Reaction score
327
That's been one my arguments for a while. If its truly about "saving just one life" ban alcohol and cigarettes. See how that goes for you.

Because it would represent a monumental loss of revenue.
Cigs and alc are probably the highest taxed commodities - for your own good of course - and there's no way they'll relinquish that cash cow.
 
Top Bottom