Vela: Barron and Cox might be too hott for Dallas

Messages
46,859
Reaction score
10
Posted by Rafael at Monday, April 23, 2012

Here's some NFL draft smoke and eggs for Monday brunch. Apply the necessary amount of salt:

-- A source told me this morning that Alabama safety Mark Barron is one of the hottest names right now and may be gone before the Cowboys pick at 14. Knowledge of Dallas' interest may fuel a deal up. I was told the Tennessee Titans might look to deal up into the 11-13 range to get Barron. I was told similar things about the Jets (currently 16th) and the Eagles (15th).

-- Fletcher Cox is also a hot name. Miami was mentioned as a landing spot if they don't land Ryan Tannehill, or if they decide to pass on Texas A&M quarterback.

-- Another source told me the Cox-to-St. Louis rumors which surfaced late last week are off-base, and that the Rams are looking at other players.

-- The Stephon Gilmore-to-Jacksonville meme may be concretizing; everybody hears it.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
1
Been mentioned here quite a bit. Pretty safe pick too.

looks like a less athletic Roy Williams who makes no plays but as long as he can stand back there and tell Orlando Scandrick where to stand I guess he's worth #14.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
10
It seems like non-Barron backers are in the vast majority.

In Twitterland, #Cowboys fans are #ejaculating over the #idea of landing him in the #NFLDraft2012
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
1
It seems like non-Barron backers are in the vast majority.

In Twitterland, #Cowboys fans are #ejaculating over the #idea of landing him in the #NFLDraft2012

I need a translator for this garbage.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
63,526
Reaction score
13,273
looks like a less athletic Roy Williams who makes no plays but as long as he can stand back there and tell Orlando Scandrick where to stand I guess he's worth #14.

He makes alot of plays, and he seems alot more athletic and better in space than RW was, by quite a bit.

Not sure if you've ever seen him play with some of the comments you make.
 

superpunk

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,003
Reaction score
1
He makes alot of plays, and he seems alot more athletic and better in space than RW was, by quite a bit.

Not sure if you've ever seen him play with some of the comments you make.

We need another guy in the secondary who can be a step late but make the tackle right after the first down reception. This is our man.
 
Messages
10,636
Reaction score
0
We need another guy in the secondary who can be a step late but make the tackle right after the first down reception. This is our man.

Hes going to place the 10 other guys into the exact position they're going to need to be for how the play unfolds. They won't even need to move
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
126
right on superpunk.

dbair: "if you don't like him you must not have seen him play" Jesus man. Tell me again why you don't post over there?

At DCU, we like our posters to have opinions. Some like Barron, some don't like him as much. Have an open mind.
 

bbgun

Administrator
Messages
15,358
Reaction score
2,687
Then they can have him. If we stay put and he falls in our lap, fine, but don't squander picks by trading up.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
63,526
Reaction score
13,273
right on superpunk.

dbair: "if you don't like him you must not have seen him play" Jesus man. Tell me again why you don't post over there?

At DCU, we like our posters to have opinions. Some like Barron, some don't like him as much. Have an open mind.

shut up, my opinion is all that matters
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
63,526
Reaction score
13,273
Then they can have him. If we stay put and he falls in our lap, fine, but don't squander picks by trading up.

I dont know that I agree, I guess it depends on how much a team likes a certain player. if they (whether its us or anyone else) is totally sold on a guy and think that he's a perfect fit, excellent player etc etc, then sacrificing a little to move up an ensure that you get THAT guy, and not "settle" for a lesser guy makes sense.

Depends on what you have to give up etc etc, but if you need to move up a few spots to make sure you get a guy and it only costs a middle round pick or something, that isnt a bad move.
 

bbgun

Administrator
Messages
15,358
Reaction score
2,687
I dont know that I agree, I guess it depends on how much a team likes a certain player. if they (whether its us or anyone else) is totally sold on a guy and think that he's a perfect fit, excellent player etc etc, then sacrificing a little to move up an ensure that you get THAT guy, and not "settle" for a lesser guy makes sense.

Depends on what you have to give up etc etc, but if you need to move up a few spots to make sure you get a guy and it only costs a middle round pick or something, that isnt a bad move.

But if you stay put, other guys will be there at 14 who still fit a need, be it on the OL, DL or perhaps OLB. If we were one game-changer away from something special, I could see the wisdom, but that's not the case (sorry, optimists). And moving up from 14 to say 11 will cost them at least a third, not a bargain rate fifth.
 
Top Bottom