Does anyone have a reliable source for a cliff notes explanation of what the prosecutor in NYC is claiming Trump did?
I dont have time to keep up with all this stuff but what I've gathered is she's claiming he overvalued real estate for a loan with a bank (that has since been paid off).
Is that really the crux of the case?
Ive been in the real estate business for 30 years and have taken out a lot of loans and in every single case, they dont give two shits what I think the property is worth. I could say I think my property is worth a billion and it would just be my opinion that means nothing to a lender and their underwriter. The 3rd part appraiser determines the value for the basis of the loan and then a deal is made relying on that appraisal. So unless Trump manipulated the appraiser/appraisal, there is no crime here and if thats the extent of the claim, this should never have gone to court in the first place.
Surely I'm mistaken?
I guess for me, Trump ran and lost in 2020 so that leaves the race open in 2024. If Trump was an incumbent I would understand the point. But Trump did not perform well in 2020 and neither did the candidates he endorsed. And the same was true in 2022. His hand picked Senate candidate in Pennsylvania lost to John Fetterman, a brain damaged bozo who can't speak or comprehend what he hears.Come on now Creeper. Everyone knew DeSantis was going to run. Matter of fact, I'd bet we all hoped for a Trump DeSantis ticket and were a bit dissapointed when he decided to primary Trump. But DeSantis showed his ass early and often. I may not agree with Trump's methods but I do agree with his reasoning. DeSantis stabbed Trump in the back. That's just the reality of the situation and Trump started firing off shots. I don't blame him, although I may not agree with the way he did it.
What choice do we have but to at least vote? And people did staff (stake out) the drop boxes in AZ and were video taping any suspect activity. To the point where the left took these people to court to get them to vacate. But then they out-thought all of us and fucked with the machines. The fraud occurred right before our eyes and blatently out in the open. People are still takeing election commissions to court to release public documents for inspection and th left has been fighting them for the last 3 years. Voting is supposed to be transparent but the left leaning courts are covering for their treason.
What do you mean by "if Trump is so far ahead?" Do you think the numbers are off or someone is lying? What you should be asking is what are these people (primary candidates) doing? The only person who may have had a shot at beating Trump was DeSantis. If anything, the others should have backed out and made it a 2 person primary for the good of the party and country. But they didn't. And then DeSantis just kept shooting himself in the foot. He got poor advice and his instincts were even poorer to not take a different path/tact. He can't win by attacking Trump. Yet there he goes. Americans/Conservatives need a fighter. They don't need a Ryan/McConnell/Romney Republican which is exactly what DeSantis is.
Trump has done nothing but expose the corruption in DC. No one could take the amount of heat he's taking. No one. That's just a fact. That's why people like him. He's a fighter. And he's getting 20 plus percent of the black vote and a rising percentage of the Hispanic vote. The line of thought in the past was if a Republican could get a percentage of black voters in the low teens, he/she would win. Trump did much more than that and lost because of the fraud. You may not know it yet, but he's the only person that can energize people to vote in record numbers and draw minority groups into the Republican ranks. That's just the way it is.
I believe this to a point. But have you been to Florida? Yes, people have moved there by the boatloads. But the place has gotten way over-priced and expensive. I own property there and I go there often. It's unaffordable. And it will blow up. Mark my words. Florida's best selling point was that it was a better alternative than these leftist over-taxed states. But Florida is getting there.......
I like the way you think and you seem rational and guided by facts and evidence but that doesnt make you a source (no offense).Do you consider me a reliable source?
a NY Law that does not require intent or damages to claim a lawsuit for fraud...Apparently it also doesn't require a victim with regitimate standing to file the suit.
James brought in a banking expert who claims that overvaluing Trump assets allowed him to get lower interest rates from the banks and Trump's benefit from these lower rates amounts to about $168 million. The banks are not claiming this though.
Was this paperwork & disclaimer made public so I could read it?Also, Trump included a disclaimer with his paperwork to the banks. The disclaimer admits his valuations could be different that those of the banks and it even says banks are free to do their own appraisals. Oddly, the judge refused to allow this disclaimer into evidence.
Where did you learn this? & how does a judge rule before a case goes to trial?He actually ruled on the outcome of this case before the trial!
I like the way you think and you seem rational and guided by facts and evidence but that doesnt make you a source (no offense).
I'd like to see published documents I could read (or videos of testimony) and the specific law used by James to make her case
Was this paperwork & disclaimer made public so I could read it?
Where did you learn this? & how does a judge rule before a case goes to trial?
With deep fakes, etc getting so good, I dont know how we'll be able to ascertain the truth in the future
All of these "cases" are without warrant and part of a scheme that's been in place since election night 2016based on what I've learned thus far and you've corroborated, this case is unreal and whats even worse is no one seems to be concerned about it because its Trump
These fucking idiots.
One of the easiest things to ever do and without any question for justification, and they fuck this up too.
Rino's are as bad as fucking Democrats. Honestly they might even be worse, because Dems don't try to hide what they are.
great stuff, thx amigo
I would have found it eventually via google (I hope) but you guys are so familiar with this stuff I figured y'all could save me some time
now I have to find time to read and digest
based on what I've learned thus far and you've corroborated, this case is unreal and whats even worse is no one seems to be concerned about it because its Trump
The Republiucan Party must be purged of these RINO's. Anyone who doesn't think Mayorkas should be impeached is down right crazy. The guy has opened the borders and is not enforcing immigration laws. These people have flooded the country with illegals for the sole purpose of stealing votes, via fraud. The states will allow these people to have driver's licenses and then register them to vote. This would never happen in a true sovereign country that valued the security of their citizens.
Yes, this is exactly the problem you state in your last sentence. Half the country encourages the DOJ and Democrat DAs to stretch the law to get Trump and his supporters. They cheer on lengthy, unfair sentences for J6 protesters. They root for corrupt DAs to prosecute Trump using laws they twist to give them new meaning. Do these people not realize these same practices, if they become normal conduct, will eventually come back to haunt them? Every case against Trump is legally unprecedented. But watch how the media covers these cases. The never provide the exculpatory evidence/testimony or even the objective legal analysis to show that Trump is being singled out for harassment by the government.
The Georgia case is just as bad. Using RICO laws to prosecute Trump and 18 other defendants for using legal maneuvering to correct what they thought were bogus results of the election there is almost criminal behaviors by the DA. They called Trump and his legal team a "criminal enterprise" for doing exactly what John Kennedy did in 1960.
anyone have cliff notes of whats going with these two?
what do you make of the two attorneys who cut a deal?
The "release the kraken" one is now saying she was never Trumps attorney (& vice versa) plus some younger one seems to be despondent in retrospect and racked with regret
I have no time to read much except headlines and one interview but its left me thinking WTF is going here?
How could the kraken lady not be Trumps attorney?
I saw a headline saying they were about to spill the beans or something
anyone have cliff notes of whats going with these two?