Messages
5,432
Reaction score
0
Packers happy Cowboys abandoned running game
By Chris Wesseling
Around the League Writer
Published: Dec. 16, 2013 at 05:18 p.m.
Updated: Dec. 17, 2013 at 10:20 a.m.


When the Dallas Cowboys lost a 17-16 squeaker at Kansas City in September, coach Jason Garrett conceded that his team simply has to "run the ball more." When DeMarco Murray averaged 7.75 yards on just four carries in a narrow 27-23 win over the Vikings in early November, Garrett stated a renewed commitment to a more balanced offense.

All of those pledges to institute a consistent ground attack went out the window Sunday. Tony Romo attempted 48 passes in a game he led 26-3, 29-10 and 36-24 at various points in the second half.

The victorious Packers were perplexed yet grateful for the Cowboys' much-derided, soap operatic play-calling.

"We watched (Murray) last week with the coaches and we said, 'This guy is the real deal,'" Packers defensive tackle Ryan Pickett said, via the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel's Bob McGinn. "He's tough, fast and so deceptively strong. He's one of the most underrated backs.

"Oh, my God. It's the best zone scheme in the league," Pickett continued. "The last four weeks, nobody could stop it -- their zone scheme. And they gave up on it. We're just happy they did. We were, like, 'OK, we'll take it.'"

Pickett wasn't the only Green Bay player to express astonishment at Dallas' refusal to lean on Murray with a commanding lead.

"That's just who they are," cornerback Tramon Williams said. "They run the ball really well against everybody they play, but they just never stick with it."

The highlight of McGinn's masterpiece of a game recap was Pickett's acknowledgment that his teammates knew they could recover from Dallas' first-half roundhouses to pull off a historic comeback "even with Matt Flynn" as the quarterback.

After pointing out Romo's game-changing error in the heartbreaking loss, an incessantly passive Garrett offered another empty promise Monday to run the ball and maintain balance.

Garrett's penchant for abandoning the run while finding creative ways to lose tight games raises two questions:

Does the coaching staff have any semblance of faith in Murray's ability to stay healthy under a heavy workload?

Is owner Jerry Jones going to continue to deflect all queries into Garrett's job security as his team lags behind in game-planning, play-calling and time management?
 

Cowboysrule122

Draft Pick
Messages
3,728
Reaction score
0
Of course they are, if we ran the ball like we should've the Packers don't have all that time to come back.

BAD COACHING!!!
 

BangersandMash

Practice Squad
Messages
417
Reaction score
0
I'm pretty sure about 3/4 of the teams in the NFL would kill to have Demarco Murray. On pure talent alone he's the second best player the Cowboys have on offense IMO.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
55,137
Reaction score
6,210
I'm pretty sure about 3/4 of the teams in the NFL would kill to have Demarco Murray. On pure talent alone he's the second best player the Cowboys have on offense IMO.

Tyron Smith and Dez are better talents than Murray, but I do agree with you. A lot of teams would like to have him. When he is healthy he is a really good all around back.
 
Top Bottom