MacMahon: Why did Rob Ryan play so soft vs. Seahawks?

bkeavs

UDFA
Messages
2,189
Reaction score
0
MacMahon: Why did Rob Ryan play so soft vs. Seahawks?





Why did Rob Ryan play so soft vs. Seahawks?
September, 17, 2012

By Tim MacMahon | ESPNDallas.com

Defensive coordinator Rob Ryan isn’t talking to the media after games this season, so we’ll have to wait until Friday afternoon to ask this question:

What the heck was up with that soft game plan against the Seahawks?

This was a disgrace to the blitz-happy Ryan family name. Give credit to Seattle’s Russell Wilson for playing a poised, mistake-free game, but the Cowboys barely tried to rattle the vertically challenge rookie quarterback with blitzes.

Ryan called only six blitzes on Wilson’s 25 dropbacks. And this came after Wilson went 6-of-18 for 47 yards and was sacked three times against five-plus-man pressure in a Week 1 loss to the Cardinals, according to numbers crunched by ESPN Stats & Information.

It’s not like Wilson burned the Cowboys when they blitzed. He was 3-of-5 for only 21 yards and was sacked once.

Wilson, who had plenty of time in the pocket against the Cowboys’ three- and four-man rushes, completed 12 of 15 passes for 130 yards and a touchdown when Dallas didn’t blitz. He also scrambled three times for 26 yards and was sacked once, in garbage time.

The Seahawks averaged 7.6 yards per play when Wilson dropped back against regular pressure. Seattle averaged 2.8 yards per play when Wilson dropped back against the blitz. But the Cowboys blitzed less than a quarter of his dropbacks?!

The Cowboys’ personnel makes the lack of aggressiveness by Ryan even more puzzling.

The Cowboys’ sorry cornerbacks forced Ryan to play soft too often last season. That’s no longer the case after Jerry Jones invested $50 million in Brandon Carr and a first-round pick in Morris Claiborne. The Cowboys should have felt more than comfortable leaving their corners alone against mediocre receivers like Sidney Rice, Braylon Edwards and Golden Tate.

And the Seahawks played most of the game with a backup left tackle and right guard. Maybe Ryan figured that Pro Bowl pass rusher DeMarcus Ware would wreak havoc against Frank Omiyale, a tackle so bad the Bears got rid of him. Ware’s lack of impact was one of the biggest mysteries of the afternoon.

But why not see if Seattle’s patchwork offensive line could handle Ryan’s creative blitz schemes? Why not force a munchkin rookie quarterback to make decisions under duress?

We’ll try to get answers. Just wait until Friday.
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
126
Off subject..but you know what else I'm sick of ? Head Coaches who are responsible for one side of the ball. With Wade, it was "his defense" and Garrett was in charge of the offense. Now Garrett is in charge but it's Rob Ryans' defense.

How about we hire a Head Coach who is in charge of the whole team? Then we can hire coordinators who run their units.
 

diehard2294

Practice Squad
Messages
427
Reaction score
0
I think Ryan is tanking it because his father still hates the Cowboys and told him to do so:eek:k
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
62,103
Reaction score
12,037
This issue is even worse IMO when you consider that 1) their starting LT didnt play and 2) One of their starting G's went out very early in the game, leaving them with two backups playing up front. To me this is a WTF kind of thing.

Ryan called only six blitzes on Wilson’s 25 dropbacks. And this came after Wilson went 6-of-18 for 47 yards and was sacked three times against five-plus-man pressure in a Week 1 loss to the Cardinals, according to numbers crunched by ESPN Stats & Information.
 
Messages
4,952
Reaction score
0
You'd think that Ryan would have been salivating with his different blitz packages for the little rookie.

Fatass got pwned.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
62,103
Reaction score
12,037
You'd think that Ryan would have been salivating with his different blitz packages for the little rookie.

Fatass got pwned.

I just cant figure it. Maybe they thought by dropping more people into coverage he would be more likely to throw the ball into coverages. Made no sense though when I was watching it. I thought we'd have 8 or 9 up there almost every play.
 
Messages
4,952
Reaction score
0
Especially since AZ showed the blueprint week 1.

As many have said, I thought the whole point of getting these CBs was to blitz recklessly.

I wonder if Rob got yelled at for repeatedly dropping the F bomb on NBC, and used this as a way to pout.
 
Messages
10,636
Reaction score
0
I don't think he thought they could matriculate down the field at will like that. So he was hoping to play conservative and get them to stall out. Ie no cheapies


But if we can't play zero coverage on Wilson/Braylon/Doug Baldwin then mine as well pack it in. That was the 2nd worst passing attack well face all year
 

CowboysRMX

In the Rotation
Messages
727
Reaction score
0
its the air in seattle. Remember the WC game? the hawks secondary was all injured. And Dallas didnt even attempt to challenge it.
 
Top Bottom