Let Romo do it

[UVAwahoos]

It was an idea.

Im saying herpy derp derpy derp. Herpy derp derp. Herp derpy derpy.

unce Wallah

ostoftheday

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Lol. Is your life hell yet, Sheik?

 

[UVAwahoos]

Romo needs someone to call plays to alleviate the pressure. Its no secret he folds, and I think a lot of that has to do with him having so much on his shoulders. He needs help with the play calling.

Bingo. "Romo friendly" would be a coach like Fox, Payton or both Harbaughs who are smart enough to recognize the abilities and more importantly the flaws of their QBs and they don't sit there and ask too much. There are countless examples of coaches setting up QBs to fail by not developing a system around them. This is what's happening in Dallas.

I always go back to that '06 Seattle wildcard game. Parcells called it perfectly bc he was fully aware of Romo's limitations as essentially a rookie starter in a crazy road environment. We don't gameplan like that anymore bc we don't have a coach

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Eww, hugh thornton looks bad.

 

[dbair1967]

I always go back to that '06 Seattle wildcard game. Parcells called it perfectly bc he was fully aware of Romo's limitations as essentially a rookie starter in a crazy road environment. We don't gameplan like that anymore bc we don't have a coach

Yeah, we lost that game because of an incredibly assinine gameplan designed by a burnout coach who was a decade past his prime.

It was pathetic, one of the worst game plans in NFL postseason history.

 

[UVAwahoos]

Yeah, we lost that game because of an incredibly assinine gameplan designed by a burnout coach who was a decade past his prime.

It was pathetic, one of the worst game plans in NFL postseason history.

So attack their "shitty" secondary and throw 3 ints? Skins had a shitty secondary and that's exactly what just happened.

It took equipment crews cheating with slippery balls for them to win. It was a good gameplan. The franchise hasn't had a such thing since that year.

 

[dbair1967]

So attack their "shitty" secondary and throw 3 ints? Skins had a shitty secondary and that's exactly what just happened.

It took equipment crews cheating with slippery balls for them to win. It was a good gameplan. The franchise hasn't had a such thing since that year.

The Skins didnt have street free agents out there

It was awful, we should have hung 35 or so on them that day...and that same secondary gave up nearly 300 yds to Rex Grossman a week later

 

[UVAwahoos]

Wipe that frothy male group orgy cum off your eyes, amigo. Chicago was slighty better than Dallas and that game wasn't in Seattle. Even then, they had to go into OT to barely win by a field goal.

Bringing Chicago up really just weakened your already fragile argument.