dbair1967
Administrator
- Messages
- 61,352
- Reaction score
- 11,255
First, I am not a proponent of this. I've been on the Wentz/Goff bandwagon and believe we should take one of them (if available) at 4. In fact if they are convinced that one is considerably better than the other, they should pursue a trade up ahead of the Browns to ensure they get that guy.
That said, lets say Wentz goes at 2 to Browns, leaving Goff for us. For whatever reason, the Cowboys decide they are only lukewarm on Goff and the Rams call, wanting him badly. The trade chart (http://www.ourlads.com/nfldraftvalue/) says pick 4 is valued at 1800, the Rams 1st and 2nd rd picks are (15= 1050 pts, 43= 470, 45=450). Theoretically they'd have to offer at least that to get into our spot. (To make the pts whole, we might have to throw them a late rd pick in return, though I doubt it if the QB is involved. They might even have to throw another late pick of their own in instead) Would you do it, and if so who would you then draft with our 1st (15th overall) and our three 2nd rd picks (34, 43 & 45)
That said, lets say Wentz goes at 2 to Browns, leaving Goff for us. For whatever reason, the Cowboys decide they are only lukewarm on Goff and the Rams call, wanting him badly. The trade chart (http://www.ourlads.com/nfldraftvalue/) says pick 4 is valued at 1800, the Rams 1st and 2nd rd picks are (15= 1050 pts, 43= 470, 45=450). Theoretically they'd have to offer at least that to get into our spot. (To make the pts whole, we might have to throw them a late rd pick in return, though I doubt it if the QB is involved. They might even have to throw another late pick of their own in instead) Would you do it, and if so who would you then draft with our 1st (15th overall) and our three 2nd rd picks (34, 43 & 45)
