gameplan for attacking green bay's defense

icup

Super Moderator
Messages
10,473
Reaction score
6,744
Dallas Cowboys: Sturm's Decoding Linehan - Gameplan For Attacking Green Bay's Defense | SportsDay

Sturm's Decoding Linehan - Gameplan For Attacking Green Bay's Defense

By Bob Sturm , Special contributor Contact Bob Sturmon Twitter:mad:SportsSturm

Today and tomorrow, we are going to look at the matchups for Sundays divisional playoff against the Green Bay Packers and discuss what the Cowboys can do to reach the NFC Championship Game. We review the matchup in Week 6, look at the current affairs of each side, and try to imagine some objectives for Scott Linehan and Rod Marinelli.
I don't wish to spoil tomorrow's piece, but let's just say Linehan is going to have a much easier strategy session than Marinelli. The defense is going to have to figure quite a few problems out that they will be presented with on Sunday. But, the offense? They just have to be themselves.

Dallas has one of the best offenses in the NFL and if they continue to perform at those levels, there is no reason they cannot play in a Super Bowl in 3 weeks. You could argue they never played better than in this Week 6 battle in Green Bay, and you could also argue that this playoff game may resemble the Pittsburgh game in that both offenses were able to score at will - and therefore, the team with the ball last might be the one to win. This game could have a NBA feel to it. One stop might be enough to win the game.

But, let's focus on Scott Linehan's situation here for a moment. Some easy thoughts to start:

1) Green Bay is a high-risk defense. They will concede a ton of yardage and not seem to care, because the overall philosophy for Dom Capers up there for several years is that yards are just numbers. He is trying to find takeaways. The best way to get takeaways are sacks and pressure. And the best way to generate pressure is to leave your corners on islands. This often leads to a lot of chances for the offense, and he is playing the odds that if you are going to drive the ball, you will at some point either get reckless with the ball or fail on a 3rd down. The good news here is that the Cowboys were great in both regards this season. They never turned the ball over and were quite efficient on 3rd downs. The Cowboys were also able to chase the Packers out of their blitzes.

2) The Packers don't have the ability to man-up with their current corner personnel. You could argue that their only healthy corner this year - LaDarius Gunter - was their 5th corner when the season began. Sam Shields is their lead and makes $12m a year. He has played in 1 game. Then, Damarious Randall and Quinton Rollins are their top draft picks from 2015 and both played in 10 games. So, from a standpoint of their top 3 corners, they have lost 29 starts amongst them in just this season. That leaves Gunter, Randall (back again), and Micah Hyde to play corner for them. This is better than what it was in Week 6, but there are some significant matchup issues.

3) The Packers pass rush was pretty good at times this season, but not now. On paper, Clay Matthews, Julius Peppers, Mike Daniels, and Nick Perry looks scary. But, Matthews will have surgery when the season ends on a shoulder that has been jacked up since their trip to Philadelphia in November and he appears to be a shell of himself. Nick Perry broke his hand and has had to play with a club on it, which has not helped his effectiveness. Julius Peppers does have a few moments a game at his advanced age, but their pass rush is not going to overwhelm Dallas at all.

4) Ezekiel Elliott ran all day against them in Week 6 and did not have Dez Bryant to affect the safeties. It will be tempting for the Cowboys to look around at all of the inviting matchups, but they should not lose the plot. Elliott and the running game should allow them to hold the ball and keep Aaron Rodgers on the sideline. This is the easiest route to victory. They need to plaster that all over the gameplan so they don't forget when the adrenaline starts pumping. This should be a game to shoot for 40 minutes of possession time. Yes, there are chances in the passing game. But, you will want to fight the urge to go looking to take advantage of them, because your best opportunity is feeding Zeke.

5) Cole Beasley is a massive mismatch. I know most people will think Dez is your matchup issue, but I don't believe that in this game. Gunter is very solid against physical receivers (even Julio Jones), but speed gives them fits as a group. Micah Hyde inside against Beasley was a matchup that was very successful in Week 6. The Packers have no better options in the slot and this should be even better on a fast track.
Here was the damage Beasley did back on October 16th, thanks to another John Daigle chart. He had 6 catches on 6 targets and 2 touchdowns of the 5 he had all year.


Cole Beasley Route Chart - Week 6


Let's look at a few:

This first one was a quick hitter to beat a Green Bay blitz. As you can see, Green Bay is chasing out a LB to try to deal with Brice Butler and Cole Beasley. That goes quite poorly for Dom Capers.

So, this is Micah Hyde lining up in man against Beasley on the goal-line. Asking him or just about any corner to handle this seems like a very poor job of tactics from Green Bay. And, Dallas takes easy advantage of it. They are in man because they need all of the manpower they have to deal with the goal-line runs of Elliott.

Here is 3rd and 8. They know that the Packers are in 2-deep. They know that the middle is open and that the Packers are man-up with Hyde on Beasley. This is a massive mismatch for the Cowboys and look how easy they can convert this as Hyde can't handle the initial release.

Again, 2-Deep, man under. Beasley gets out on the WR screen and with a pulling Tyron taking out the middle LB who cannot run with Beasley anyway, this one is another big gainer up the sideline.

Finally, the 4th-Quarter kill shot that put this out of reach. Play-action to hold them with the running game and then exposing a easy throw mismatch to the pylon. This is Beasley versus Gunter which is basically a safety trying to run with Beasley in a phone booth. Good luck.

Now, as you can see, all of this is based off Green Bay trying to deal with the running game.
Here is the staggering truth. Since 2013, the Cowboys have played the Packers 4 times. In each game, they ran all day and had no issues whatsoever. They ran and ran and ran. They have run the ball with this massive offensive line against the Packers and Dom Capers 99 times in 4 games and have rolled up an absurd 641 yards.

99 carries for 641 yards is 6.48 yards per carry. Oh, and the Cowboys are 1-3 in those 4 games. Now, we could argue whether or not there are mitigating circumstances that explain this, but the point remains that running the ball is key. It is not the only key.

That said, it is interesting that in Week 6, Elliott ran all day out of 12 and 13 personnel. In fact, they ran out of 11 personnel on 9 occasions for 15 yards. No, this was a day for big personnel, and the Cowboys were able to break some open in the 2nd half.

This one is easy. Up the middle and then bounce outside and beat the contain man to the corner and he is out of the gate. There is very little a defense can do against this speed to the outside when they overcommit to the middle.

Here is 12 personnel again. We wonder how much of this changes without Geoff Swaim who was a big part of this day's production. More 11 personnel on Sunday, we assume, which has been the Cowboys best look for the 2nd half of the year.

One more out of 12 personnel. There is nothing at the 2nd level with the linebackers that should scare the Cowboys at all. The Packers are built for finding big plays, not stopping long drives.
Check out the personnel groupings and chart from that game:

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
The Cowboys offense can have a bad day on Sunday. How would that look?
Well, they cannot fall behind. They must start quickly, because a 10-0 Green Bay lead might change all sorts of things in the stadium. They simply must take control early - as they did in Lambeau, because if they do, the boa constrictor that is the Dallas offense will begin to suffocate the Green Bay ideas.

They must convert on 3rd downs and they must be careful with the football. It is a delicate balance.
Garrett certainly wants to hold the ball and dominate the clock. But, that means long drives. And long drives require 3rd down precision and mistake-free football without penalties and turnovers.

The Cowboys have done it time and time again this season. But, in the playoffs, none of that matters. For reference, please check out the "Decoding Linehan" from after the first game, including the Dallas success against the Green Bay blitz. There are plenty more videos to look at to prepare you for this.

We have showed you some matchup advantages for Sunday and there are several. But, in Dak Prescott's first playoff game, all eyes will be on him to see how this offense executes in these high pressure spots. They know they can do it, they just need to actually do it.

Linehan has some very interesting ideas and matchups that should work against an inferior defense from Green Bay. Tomorrow, we look at Marinelli's decidedly more difficult task.
 

icup

Super Moderator
Messages
10,473
Reaction score
6,744
right click the link and open link in incognito window to see all the charts and videos.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
I think more than any other game, it will be critical for us to score first. And a TD. This can't be a game where we're settling for field goals.
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
3
I think we just do what we normally do. Not like they present any special problems.

Just don't make any dumb mistakes and the offense should roll.
 

SixisBetter

Anywhere on the line.
Messages
4,211
Reaction score
370
I think we just do what we normally do.

Yes. The Cowboys have established their identity as a team, and I don't believe Prescott's going to falter now.
In spite of Garrett's presence, and our recent playoff history, I'm buying in.
 
Last edited:

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
I had forgotten that Dez didn't play against the Packers this year. Team didn't miss a beat. Dez has been playing a lot better, and I tghink he's poised for a big game here.

Say what you want about Dez, and much is warranted, but he does add a dimension to the offense that now Capers has to account for, unlike the last game.
 

MrB

Draft Pick
Messages
4,142
Reaction score
463
I would expect Zeke to have around 30 carries in this game. The game plan should be easy. Long methodical drives that end in TD's. make the Packers play from behind.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
22,851
Reaction score
5,740
I would expect Zeke to have around 30 carries in this game.
Wouldn't that be a first for him as a pro? Or maybe the second time? Why on Earth do you expect that?
 

MrB

Draft Pick
Messages
4,142
Reaction score
463
Wouldn't that be a first for him as a pro? Or maybe the second time? Why on Earth do you expect that?

He's only had 12 carries over the last 3 weeks (up to game day). They have been saving him for a reason. Dallas also has a huge advantage over Green Bay in the run game. Feed the beast and run the ball down their throats. He's been close to 30 carries a couple times this year and I believe we will see Zeke playing on a lot of 3rd downs instead of Dunbar.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
22,851
Reaction score
5,740
They have been saving him for a reason.
LOL

Must be nice to live in such a fantasy world, where anyone in Dallas has any such strategic capabilities or even thoughts.

And it's actually 35 carries over the last three games.
 

MrB

Draft Pick
Messages
4,142
Reaction score
463
LOL

Must be nice to live in such a fantasy world, where anyone in Dallas has any such strategic capabilities or even thoughts.

And it's actually 35 carries over the last three games.

You're right, they only gave him 35 carries over 3 games because he sucks. That must be why they benched him against the Eagles.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
22,851
Reaction score
5,740
You're right, they only gave him 35 carries over 3 games because he sucks. That must be why they benched him against the Eagles.
That's your own cross to bear - can't argue valid points so you dishonestly try to put words in people's mouths. Meanwhile you stupidly believe they had some grand strategic plan to have him "fresh for green bay" and ignorantly thought he had only 12 carries in the last three games. I am glad I could educate you on the correct stats, and fortunately everyone except you automatically KNOWS they kept him out of the game against Philadelphia, to ensure he didn't get injured. And for no other reason.

Like I said you live in a fucking fantasy world devoid of any realism - the fact is he was getting MORE carries on average before the blowout against Detroit, and when that game was well in hand they sat him, again to prevent injury. And for no other reason.

They had no fucking "plan to have him rested" for the playoffs. They had a plan to keep him from getting hurt in games that didn't matter.

More of your fantasy involves running him for 30-plus carries against GB. Like the GB coaching and scouting staff hasn't thought of that one. Like they won't plan for that, seeing is that is pretty much what we did to them the first time. They won't forget 28 carries for 157 yards, they have it on film and stuff.
 

MrB

Draft Pick
Messages
4,142
Reaction score
463
That's your own cross to bear - can't argue valid points so you dishonestly try to put words in people's mouths. Meanwhile you stupidly believe they had some grand strategic plan to have him "fresh for green bay" and ignorantly thought he had only 12 carries in the last three games. I am glad I could educate you on the correct stats, and fortunately everyone except you automatically KNOWS they kept him out of the game against Philadelphia, to ensure he didn't get injured. And for no other reason.

Like I said you live in a fucking fantasy world devoid of any realism - the fact is he was getting MORE carries on average before the blowout against Detroit, and when that game was well in hand they sat him, again to prevent injury. And for no other reason.

They had no fucking "plan to have him rested" for the playoffs. They had a plan to keep him from getting hurt in games that didn't matter.

More of your fantasy involves running him for 30-plus carries against GB. Like the GB coaching and scouting staff hasn't thought of that one. Like they won't plan for that, seeing is that is pretty much what we did to them the first time. They won't forget 28 carries for 157 yards, they have it on film and stuff.

Well I either struck a nerve or you were just looking for a reason to tell everyone (again) how much you hate Garrett and how much he sucks. I'm guessing it's the second one.

So go ahead, tell us (again) how much he sucks.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
22,851
Reaction score
5,740
Well I either struck a nerve or you were just looking for a reason to tell everyone (again) how much you hate Garrett and how much he sucks.
It's neither. I merely responded to a fantasy-world post I saw. I stopped having that kind of mindless, faith-based fandom when I was around 16 years old, pretty sure. Your bringing up Garrett is just a deflection tactic, one that's right up there with lying about what someone else said.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
22,851
Reaction score
5,740
I'm a HELL of a lot more worried about how we'll deal with that GB offense, which has the potential to shut down our offense by keeping it off the field.
 

MrB

Draft Pick
Messages
4,142
Reaction score
463
Having Jordy Nelson out would help. Even if he plays though I doubt he'll be very effective. Might actually be an opportunity to strip the ball.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
22,851
Reaction score
5,740
Having Jordy Nelson out would help. Even if he plays though I doubt he'll be very effective. Might actually be an opportunity to strip the ball.
For some weird reason they always seem to have contingencies for when they lose key players. Yes I realize we never see that in Dallas, but yeah other teams do seem to still be able to keep winning without key pieces of their arsenal, somehow.

I think whatever it takes we simply have to harass Rodgers and put him on the deck, regularly. Cut off the head of the snake.
 

MrB

Draft Pick
Messages
4,142
Reaction score
463
For some weird reason they always seem to have contingencies for when they lose key players. Yes I realize we never see that in Dallas, but yeah other teams do seem to still be able to keep winning without key pieces of their arsenal, somehow.

I think whatever it takes we simply have to harass Rodgers and put him on the deck, regularly. Cut off the head of the snake.

They need to make sure they actually get him on the ground. The last thing they (or any of us) want is that arrogant piece of shit running around for 8-9 seconds like he was last week.
 
Top Bottom