Fisher: Cowboys Personnel Boss Explains ‘How Draft Go’

Messages
46,859
Reaction score
10
By Mike Fisher, 105.3 The Fan | CBSDFW.COM
April 30, 2013 9:39 PM

IRVING (105.3 THE FAN) – “That’s the way draft go.’’

This weekend, Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones channeled Texas Rangers manager Ron Washington with a winking nod to the unpredictability of the NFL Draft. His behind-the-scenes point: Maybe the Cowboys bounced back from receiving too little in exchange for moving down from the No. 18 spot when they landed offensive lineman Travis Frederick (a predicted starter) and receiver Terrance Williams (a predicted star).

But that doesn’t explain why on Thursday the Cowboys veered from their “big board’’ and decided against using the No. 18 overall pick on Florida defensive tackle Shariff Floyd, who, as of that afternoon I’m told was:

1.Ranked by the Cowboys scouting department as the seventh best player in the draft.
2.Ranked by the Cowboys as the top player left on the draft board at 18.
3.One of just a handful of remaining players the Cowboys had given first-round grades.
So what happened?

I’m told there was a conflict in the war room over the “fit’’ of Floyd’’ in Dallas new 4-3 defense vs. the value (cap-related and talent-related) of instead nabbing two players.

The personnel department wanted Floyd – because they’d worked 15 months on investigating him in ways that gave him that first-round grade. Jerry and Stephen Jones saw the benefits of going elsewhere.

“I think in a lot of cases, it’s kind of like a bridge,” Cowboys personnel boss Tom Ciskowski told the “G-Bag Nation’’ show on 105.3 The Fan. “We bring the players to the bridge and the coaches have to take them across. The main thing is just to communicate exactly what the coach wants.’’

It’s possible that Dallas’ recent change from a 3-4 to a 4-3 defense caused the change of opinion on Floyd.

“If we were still in the 3-4, we would’ve liked him as a nose (tackle),’’ Ciskowski said. “But now that we’ve transitioned back to a 4-3, he really doesn’t fit what we’re looking for.’’

Disagreement in the war room is not unique to the Cowboys. Management, coaching staff and personnel department can all have their own views.

“A lot of it,’’ Ciskowski said, “is about (coaches) educating us on what he wants at each position and it’s our job to go out and find it.”

It seems as if some of that “education’’ happened just before the Cowboys were “on the clock’’ at 18.

The decision won’t be judged immediately, though. It might take 12 months. It might take 12 years.
Because that’s also the way draft go.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
10
“If we were still in the 3-4, we would’ve liked him as a nose (tackle),’’ Ciskowski said. “But now that we’ve transitioned back to a 4-3, he really doesn’t fit what we’re looking for.’’

That makes sense. I had forgotten we just decided the day before the draft that we were switching to the 4-3.
 
Messages
3,665
Reaction score
23
I think the franchise's goal was to draft at least one top-tier, ready to start immediately, OL. And so that's what they did.

If your most glaring weakness is OL, it isn't necessarily foolhardy to pass on a top tier DT so you can partially address your glaring weakness on the OL.

My guess is that some of those looks of disappointment in the Dallas war room were in response to so many top tier OL being picked so early in the draft.
 
Messages
8,660
Reaction score
1
I think the franchise's goal was to draft at least one top-tier, ready to start immediately, OL. And so that's what they did.

If your most glaring weakness is OL, it isn't necessarily foolhardy to pass on a top tier DT so you can partially address your glaring weakness on the OL.

My guess is that some of those looks of disappointment in the Dallas war room were in response to so many top tier OL being picked so early in the draft.
So what you're saying is we drafted based purely on severity of need and probably reached to do it.

Great.
 
Messages
3,665
Reaction score
23
So what you're saying is we drafted based purely on severity of need and probably reached to do it.

Great.

No, not really. The pick was also based on the player's talent. The Cowboys saw him as a top-tier, ready to start immediately, OL.

If they reached have a half round too early, I don't see it as a big deal in the grand scheme of things.
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
126
Scouts rule the day. Garrett's in charge.

Jerry and Stephen overrule everyone and ignore the bored. Where's Mikey now?

Also, is everyone in the Personnel department retarded? Ciskowski said they saw him as a 3-4 NT?? Holy crap. What's with our obsession with undersized Nose Tackles? You know what Floyd played in college? 4-3 DT. You know what he'll play in Minnesota? 4-3 DT.

How does any fan with ability to be objective sign off on this front office?
 

Jon88

Pro Bowler
Messages
19,523
Reaction score
0
If we had taken a DT in round 1 I would have been pissed. We made the right decision.
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
6
I’m told there was a conflict in the war room over the “fit’’ of Floyd’’ in Dallas new 4-3 defense vs. the value (cap-related and talent-related) of instead nabbing two players.
This is what I thought all along. We decided ahead of time to trade down to save money. I'm sure the talk about Floyd not fitting the scheme (which Polian and the Minny coaches didn't agree with) is after-the-fact excuse making.
 
Top Bottom