Fisher: Cowboys hit a 'Downturn' in Spencer contract talks

Messages
46,859
Reaction score
10
http://www.foxsportssouthwest.com/n...er-contra?blockID=909217#.UbC-bMvYKH4.twitter

IRVING, Texas – The Dallas Cowboys have hit what a source terms a "downturn'' in contract negotiations with franchise-tagged defensive end Anthony Spencer, the problem being the club believes recent NFL deals have shoved the market value of comparable players down to the $5-million-a-year range.

The Spencer camp wants the recent five-year, $66-million extension given Packers linebacker Clay Matthews to be part of the conversation. Or, at least, the $8-million-year deal Cleveland gave pass-rushing linebacker Paul Kruger to lure him from Baltimore.

But three other NFL contracts hang like a dark cloud over Spencer's wishes of receiving a long-term deal in Dallas before July 15, the deadline to re-up him or else the one-time Pro Bowler will play out the season at the tag number of $10.6 million.

The three contracts the Cowboys are using as leverage: Cliff Avril's deal to move him to Seattle at $7.5 million a year but only for two seasons, so the total is only $13 million and the signing bonus is just $4.5 million; Elvis Dumervil's deal to move him to Baltimore at about $5 million a year; and another Seattle bargain, Michael Bennett's deal for just one year and $4.8 million.

Spencer's side is arguing that all three of this situations are anomalies, especially in the cases of Dumervil (who signed with Baltimore after the infamous fax mixup in Denver) and Bennett, signed by the Seahawks with their full knowledge of his torn rotator-cuff problem.

Spencer is clear on what he wishes his future to be.

"I want to be here for the rest of my career," says Spencer, Dallas' top defensive player last season. "Hopefully we can get that done. If we can't, then so be it."

The "so-be-it'' scenario for both sides in the Spencer negotiations isn't that bad. The Cowboys might get a contract-season performance from Spencer while avoiding overspending on an admittedly quality player who is 29 years old (as they develop replacements like Tyrone Crawford). And Spencer might get to play under the terms of that $10.6 million existing deal.
 

Jon88

Pro Bowler
Messages
19,523
Reaction score
0
Does Clay Matthews take plays off?

Spencer will do the same thing almost everyone else does here when they get rewarded with big contracts -mail it in.

Good luck on that Clay Matthews contract, Spencer.
 

cmd34(work)

Draft Pick
Messages
4,342
Reaction score
1
Clay is younger and is a league-wide marketable player. Spencer really shouldn't use that but can't blame his agent for trying.
 
Last edited:
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
0
I like Spencer, but he is lucky to be getting what he is this year. Clearly the DE market value went down a bit this year when a guy like Cliff Avril gets 2 years and 15 mil.
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
209
Does Clay Matthews take plays off?

Spencer will do the same thing almost everyone else does here when they get rewarded with big contracts -mail it in.

Good luck on that Clay Matthews contract, Spencer.


Sorry, but I've not notice either Romo, Ware, or Witten mailing it in when they got extended.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
63,370
Reaction score
13,113
Keep him under the tag for one year then move on.

I agree, but I'd caveat that by saying if he has a bigtime year at DE I might reconsider.

Of course if Crawford and/or Wilbur really show well this yr, Spencer becomes expendable.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
10
Well, the franchise tag this year is 10.6. I don't think we'd have to guarantee any more than that this year. If we got him for 4 years at 26 mil that'd be around 6.5m a year, which is what he's currently balking at. Or just above it.

Honestly, I'd almost really prefer to just rent him for hte year and move on. He might have 3 or 4 years left of really good play left, but we have a number of young guys we're going to have to re-sign in the coming years. I'd rather sign them.

I know it's early, but I've read where DE is supposed to be strong in this coming draft.
 
Top Bottom