Messages
5,432
Reaction score
0
Draft's hottest prospect: Mark Barron's worth a top-10 pick

By Charley Casserly NFL Network
Analyst.
Updated: April 18, 2012 at 03:32 p.m.

In speaking with teams these days about where particular players could be selected in the first round of the 2012 NFL Draft, I'm continually asked one particular question: Will Alabama safety Mark Barron be available when it is our turn to pick?

The message here is crystal clear: A lot of teams are very interested in selecting Barron high in Round 1. Why is there all this interest? To put it simply, Barron is one of the best players in this draft.

Most people feel that six prospects are "a cut above" the rest in this class: QB Andrew Luck, QB Robert Griffin III, OT Matt Kalil, RB Trent Richardson, CB Morris Claiborne and WR Justin Blackmon. My next-rated player is Barron.

Back in my executive days with the Washington Redskins, when there was a tie between two players on our draft board, I always asked two questions:

1) Who will make the most Pro Bowls?
2) Who do you want to take to the Meadowlands to play the Giants?

These two questions always helped break a tie.

I've studied five games of Barron in action, and he's the player who would receive the most positive answers from those two questions. Barron is 6-foot-1, 213 pounds and runs the 40-yard dash in the 4.5's. He is very smart; Nick Saban runs a complex defense at Alabama and Barron had no problem understanding it. He should be able to be the defensive signal caller for his NFL team. He is very athletic and has the ability to play man coverage versus tight ends, which is not common in a safety. He is also exceptional when playing zone defense. Barron has excellent instincts to break on the ball and the speed to cover a lot of ground. As a physical player and fine tackler, he often played linebacker in Alabama's nickel defense. When I evaluate Barron as a safety, I do not see anything he can't do. To me, he's a very safe pick.

So, how high do you take a safety? That depends on how important the position is to your defense. If it is important, then Barron qualifies as a top-10 pick in this year's draft.

Here is how I rate Barron against some highly regarded safeties taken in the top 15 of recent drafts when they were coming out of college ...

Rated higher than Barron:

• Eric Berry, 2010 draft, fifth pick (Kansas City): Better cover skills, could cover some receivers.

Rated lower than Barron:

• Earl Thomas, 2010 draft, 14th pick (Seattle): Not as good a tackler.

• LaRon Landry, 2007 draft, sixth pick (Washington): Not as stout in man-to-man coverage.

• Michael Huff, 2006 draft, seventh pick (Oakland): Not as physical.

• Donte Whitner, 2006 draft, eighth pick (Buffalo): Barron rates better in all phases of the game.

• Sean Taylor 2004 draft, fifth pick (Washington): Not as smooth in the hips, could not cover as well.

In scouting for the draft, you compare prospects to previous players taken in a round to decide what value to put on them. This is how I arrive at my thinking: Mark Barron is worth a top-10 pick.

Follow Charley Casserly on Twitter @CharleyCasserly
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
119
I would rank Barron below Taylor, Landry, and Earl Thomas.
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
119
Oh it's Casserly...that explains it. He's a crazy person.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
55,077
Reaction score
6,181
I would rank Barron below Taylor, Landry, and Earl Thomas.

Gee, what a shock

Taylor and Landry are nowhere near as smart football wise as Barron is. Dont think either of them were any better in coverage either.

Thomas is great in coverage but as Casserly pointed out, isnt very physical
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
55,077
Reaction score
6,181
Is he saying Mark Barron is better than Sean Taylor?

Probably. Taylor was one of the most overrated players ever. Once he got in the league he was a knucklehead on the field with a penchant for making as many stupid penalties and busting as many coverages as the big hits that got him onto ESPN
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
119
Do you feel Mark Barron is a better prospect than Roy Williams was?
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
55,077
Reaction score
6,181
Do you feel Mark Barron is a better prospect than Roy Williams was?

I've seen Barron play more than I saw Roy Williams at OU.

The games I saw RW play he was pretty amazing and was clearly the dominant player on the field. And he played like that in the NFL for his first 2-3 years, then dropped off the face of the earth.

I think Barron is better suited for the game the way it is now than RW was, and I think Barron physically is more of the mold of what a SS/FS needs to be like than RW. I think ultimately he will have a far better NFL career than RW.
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
119
I've seen Barron play more than I saw Roy Williams at OU.

The games I saw RW play he was pretty amazing and was clearly the dominant player on the field. And he played like that in the NFL for his first 2-3 years, then dropped off the face of the earth.

I think Barron is better suited for the game the way it is now than RW was, and I think Barron physically is more of the mold of what a SS/FS needs to be like than RW. I think ultimately he will have a far better NFL career than RW.

Yeah, I don't see that. He's a strong safety only and can't dominate a game like Roy could. He will be a little better than Roy was in deep coverage. Solid, not spectacular.
 

LAZARUS_LOGAN

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,639
Reaction score
207
Probably. Taylor was one of the most overrated players ever. Once he got in the league he was a knucklehead on the field with a penchant for making as many stupid penalties and busting as many coverages as the big hits that got him onto ESPN


The year before Taylor was killed, he led the league in TD passes given up. I used to get in it with Redskins' fans over this, I even provided footage to back it up, and you should have seen the excuse-making---they blamed every player on the Redskins but Taylor.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
Do you feel Mark Barron is a better prospect than Roy Williams was?

I don't think Barron is nearly cataclysmic as Roy Williams was coming out. People forget how good Roy was as a football player coming out of college.

He just wasn't a natural safety like Barron is.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
Yeah, I don't see that. He's a strong safety only and can't dominate a game like Roy could. He will be a little better than Roy was in deep coverage. Solid, not spectacular.

What do you mean by that? A lot of people like to throw that term around about Barron, and I suspect most don't know what they're talking about. A lot of safety play is interchangeable nowadays, so it's funny that a lot of teams have Barron rated so highly, for being a one-dimensional safety.
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
119
What do you mean by that? A lot of people like to throw that term around about Barron, and I suspect most don't know what they're talking about. A lot of safety play is interchangeable nowadays, so it's funny that a lot of teams have Barron rated so highly, for being a one-dimensional safety.

I mean that he's better closer to the line of scrimmage than he is further away from it. I mean that he has not shown me the ability to keep fast receivers in front of him or make plays on deep balls. He does not have the speed necessary to pick up a WR who cuts across the middle and challenges him deep. I think he played against a lot of non-NFL caliber QB's in the SEC and benefitted from an amazing front 7.

I think he's the best of a bad crop of 2012 safeties and teams/draft guru's think he's the best looking ugly girl right now.
 

Bob Sacamano

All-Pro
Messages
26,436
Reaction score
3
I mean that he's better closer to the line of scrimmage than he is further away from it. I mean that he has not shown me the ability to keep fast receivers in front of him or make plays on deep balls. He does not have the speed necessary to pick up a WR who cuts across the middle and challenges him deep. I think he played against a lot of non-NFL caliber QB's in the SEC and benefitted from an amazing front 7.

I think he's the best of a bad crop of 2012 safeties and teams/draft guru's think he's the best looking ugly girl right now.

You saw all that watching him play against spread, non-pro-style offenses?

You're last line has been universally panned by others already.
 

cmd34

Pro Bowler
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
119
You saw all that watching him play against spread, non-pro-style offenses?

You're last line has been universally panned by others already.

So you're saying people think he played against top caliber QB's and that he did not have a great front 7 ?
 
Top Bottom