Aikman hits nail on head regarding Romo & Cowboys QB situation

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
61,350
Reaction score
11,251
Two Tony Romo moments this season convinced Troy Aikman that Cowboys QB call is vital

By SportsDayDFW.com Contact SportsDayDFW.com on Twitter: @SportsDayDFW

In his weekly talk with The Musers on The Ticket, SportsRadio 1310 AM and 96.7 FM in Dallas, Pro Football Hall of Fame quarterback and Fox analyst Troy Aikman discussed the condition of the Dallas Cowboys' quarterback situation. Aikman pointed out that there's plenty of evidence that the Cowboys can't expect Tony Romo to be their reliable go-to guy anymore.

"People want to question how good is the offensive line," Aikman said. "They didn't run the ball as effectively as they did a year ago. There's a lot of reasons for that. But I'll put them pass protecting up against anyone in football every week, if you watch the pocket and the time the quarterbacks have to throw the ball. So last year, Tony didn't get hit much. And this year, Tony didn't get hit much."

Yet Aikman cited two red flags that have to make Cowboys fans concerned going forward. The first became apparent when he spoke with Romo following his opener with the Giants. The Fox stats crew told Aikman that the Dallas starter had only hit the ground three times against New York.

"So when we talked to Tony the next week," Aikman explained, "I said, 'You must feel like you didn't play last week. You barely got touched.' He said, 'Yeah, but at the end of the game I took a late hit in the back' and immediately said his back went back to where it was a year ago, in terms of how he had to manage it. So he was back to, 'OK, well how do I handle this this week?' And I thought that was very telling for a guy who's gotten a little bit older."

Aikman's second moment that struck him came upon Romo's return from an eight-week stint on injured reserve.

"He hadn't done anything in eight weeks except rehab and try to get healthier and all that. His first week back before that Miami Dolphins game, he didn't practice on Wednesday. And I thought, that's really strange that you'd be off for two months and yet you can't make it through an entire week of practice. I understand last year when he gets hit on a weekly basis, but to not have played in a game for two months and not be able to make it through a full week of practice, I thought that was kind of telling."

With that evidence from this season, Aikman said the Cowboys can't approach signing a backup quarterback lightly considering the condition of Romo.

"Can he go through next year and 16 games and be fine? Yeah, you don't ever know, Aikman said. "But if you just look at what's happened and be realistic about it, I think you're going to have to be able to rely on a backup. And most teams are, for at least a game or two. And with Tony, based on history, it's more probable than not that he's going to miss some time."
 
Messages
4,952
Reaction score
0
All this says is "ginger needs all pro players at every starting position and now every backup position in order to get wins"

I understand that QB is important to address but plenty of teams won with guys like gabbert and the corpse of hasselbeck.

Plus, what's the point in bringing any QB in if you don't have a coaching staff to groom them? Basically, Andrew Luck or Brady would be the only back ups who could keep ginger looking competent.
 
Messages
46,859
Reaction score
5
I think it's safe to say Romo might be done. I know a lot of people on here have been saying before this year that he probably only had 2 maybe 3 years left. Aikmans comments are telling.
 

onlyonenow

In the Rotation
Messages
526
Reaction score
1
I think 2 years frankly. Now he will have the whole offseason and he got hit very little this year so we can be somewhat hopeful. But a really good backup is now frankly a top priority. Like John Kitna, Bernie Kosar, Steve Beureline quality backup.


Or draft Goff, who is clearly the most pro ready QB in the draft this year.
 

ThoughtExperiment

Quality Starter
Messages
9,906
Reaction score
3
Yeah, that was the first anyone had heard that about Tony getting his back hurt during the Giants, wasn't it? I know we were wondering why he had to take Wednesday off when he came back from the long layoff.

I just think of Tiger Woods. He had a similar procedure years ago and he seemed to be fine kind of working around it, then completely out of the blue he has to have another surgery that puts his career in jeopardy. That's pretty much Tony now.
 
Messages
3,665
Reaction score
22
No two ways about it, there is an excellent chance that Tony is done. It sucks, but it is true.

The question is, how should the team respond to this?

For my money, I'd draft two QBs this year who have the tools to start in this league (one QB in the first two rounds and the second QB at any point after the 2nd round). I want two QBs who the scouts like ... who the scouts can imagine as starters in this league. I have no interest in drafting someone who is seen as a quality career backup. The team needs to develop a starter, not a backup. I let those two rookie QBs battle it during training camp. The winner backs up Romo; the loser makes the roster as the third team QB.

And if Romo gets hurt, we begin the future.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
61,350
Reaction score
11,251
All this says is "ginger needs all pro players at every starting position and now every backup position in order to get wins"

I understand that QB is important to address but plenty of teams won with guys like gabbert and the corpse of hasselbeck.

Plus, what's the point in bringing any QB in if you don't have a coaching staff to groom them? Basically, Andrew Luck or Brady would be the only back ups who could keep ginger looking competent.

Garrett is here now, but he might not be after next year. We really cant afford to wait any longer on drafting some real talent at the QB position. Brad Johnson when we got him is not real talent. Neither is Matt Cassel or the smurf who started the last couple of games.
 
Messages
4,952
Reaction score
0
Garrett is here now, but he might not be after next year. We really cant afford to wait any longer on drafting some real talent at the QB position. Brad Johnson when we got him is not real talent. Neither is Matt Cassel or the smurf who started the last couple of games.

So you'd rather have a shitty lifetime 3rd string QB attempt to select and groom your QB of the future?
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
61,350
Reaction score
11,251
So you'd rather have a shitty lifetime 3rd string QB attempt to select and groom your QB of the future?

The scouts can do that.

I think most everyone is in agreement that whether they work out long term or not, the top 5 or 6 talents at QB in this draft are all guys that would be vastly more talented than anyone else we have signed or drafted in the last 10 years or so.

I dont care who the coach is, but they have simply got to get some talent at the QB position beyond Romo. Since Jones has owned the team they have drafted only two in the first round (the same year, 1989), one in the 2nd rd (waste of space Quincy) and a couple middle-round guys in Musgrave (never made it here) and McGee. Its time to add early round, legit talent.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
22,798
Reaction score
5,666
This all just verifies that Tony is a time bomb, one good hit away from being retired at any moment. Also, it's obvious to me anyway Tony himself has known this, and therefore so does jerruh, Ginger, and everyone else in the organization. Might be THE reason jerruh wanted to draft the Midget.
 

cockstrong

UDFA
Messages
1,927
Reaction score
0
I remember that play as clear as day and thought for a second that can't feel good for a guy with a serious back issue. And let's all remember it was a serious back issue.
Aikman makes a lot of sense when he talks. Clearly not a good sign for Romo
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
22,798
Reaction score
5,666
And let's all remember it was a serious back issue.
There's no way anyone comes out of that type of invasive back surgery still being the man he was before it. Romo himself said he even had to re-learn how to get in and out of bed, and other such mundane things we take for granted.

What Aikman tells "out of school" here exposes what to me is a truly criminal act on the part of the Cowboys organization - they have really NEVER acknowledged how bad the back really is. Lying to themselves possibly?

You need to draft a quarterback. Been saying that for about four years now.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
61,350
Reaction score
11,251
What Aikman tells "out of school" here exposes what to me is a truly criminal act on the part of the Cowboys organization - they have really NEVER acknowledged how bad the back really is. Lying to themselves possibly?

.

Technically, its against the law for the Cowboys or anyone in the organization to discuss health info about employees.

That said, Romo could easily come out and say whatever he wants. I don't think this is a case of anyone doing anything wrongful on behalf of Romo. Its not like the Cowboys performed some secret procedure on him but said "hey Romo these docs are going to work on you, but we don't want you to know what it is"
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
22,798
Reaction score
5,666
Technically, its against the law for the Cowboys or anyone in the organization to discuss health info about employees.
Thanks for the correction - other than the weekly injury report of course.

That said, Romo could easily come out and say whatever he wants. I don't think this is a case of anyone doing anything wrongful on behalf of Romo. Its not like the Cowboys performed some secret procedure on him but said "hey Romo these docs are going to work on you, but we don't want you to know what it is"
It's just that, they have HAD to know this back wasn't healthy, even fully healed it's still a time bomb. It's just irresponsibility on their part, they should have had this covered with a draft pick waiting in the wings instead of shitty backups who have failed everywhere they've been.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
61,350
Reaction score
11,251
It's just that, they have HAD to know this back wasn't healthy, even fully healed it's still a time bomb. It's just irresponsibility on their part, they should have had this covered with a draft pick waiting in the wings instead of shitty backups who have failed everywhere they've been.

Some of that is due to the rather extreme contract they gave him.

That said, hopefully they'll act on it this year. They are in primo position to do something about it long term and avoid the catastrophe of what happened post-Troy. Stevie said today he seems them signing someone and drafting someone, which is fine. Some of us have advocated actually drafting two guys, although that would be somewhat risky because Romo is injury prone right now and we'd potentially be stuck with two rookies who might not be ready to play this year.
 

Doomsday

High Plains Drifter
Messages
22,798
Reaction score
5,666
That said, hopefully they'll act on it this year. They are in primo position to do something about it long term and avoid the catastrophe of what happened post-Troy. Stevie said today he seems them signing someone and drafting someone, which is fine. Some of us have advocated actually drafting two guys, although that would be somewhat risky because Romo is injury prone right now and we'd potentially be stuck with two rookies who might not be ready to play this year.
I would be okay with them drafting a guy at 4 and also signing Johnny Midget on the cheap. The Midget does have talent, and Jerruh is famous for straightening wandering Boys out.
Some of that is due to the rather extreme contract they gave him.
Yeah, the one if you'll remember correctly, they skipped a physical on before signing.
 

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
61,350
Reaction score
11,251
Sturm Q&A today, addresses drafting a QB at 4:


Based on your early scouting of some college QBs, who is a guy you haven't seen talked about too much that we should perhaps start looking into?


There are 2 QBs to get fired up about this year. There are many other prospects that are attractive and could be something, but the tools possessed by both Jared Goff of California and Paxton Lynch of Memphis to me are the types that you dream about. So, you add that the Cowboys pick #4 in the draft and this might be the year for the Cowboys to secure their golden boy who might be good enough to ultimately be this team's QB through the year 2025 or more (if they do it right). I hear way too many people claim that they would never take a QB that high. I think they would and I think they want to this year. I still need to do plenty of more work, but as I stand today, if either of those 2 is available at #4, I am in. Further, if I have to trade up to make sure I get the one I want, I would at least have to give it some serious thought.
 

Scot

Pro Bowler
Messages
14,979
Reaction score
6,267
I'm all in on Goff, if we have to trade up to get him I'm ok with that

Romo won't see the end of the 2017 season in my mind. He may not finish 2016!

Like others have said he is one good hit away from retirement

I want Goff or even Lynch in place this season. Even if that means he goes in for Romo when, not if he gets injured this coming season. I don't mind another train wreck of a season if it means we FINALLY find Romo's replacement. Even if that means he comes in and struggles most of the season. That just more experience for him for the next season which is where I see us finally improving and making some noise!

I'm not saying I don't want Romo as QB anymore, I'm just saying he has less than 32 games left in his career and we need to have his replacement in place and ready to go even if that means he will suck his first year which I would expect anyway
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom