2026 Election Thread

Dodger12

Dodger12

Super Moderator
Messages
8,564
Reaction score
6,212
dbair1967 said:
Not only that but one large ballot drop apparently had ZERO votes for Pratt.
Keep reading...

24000 ballots with zero Pratt votes. And somehow the person who ran in a distant 3rd and conceded on election night outperformed the candidates who were 1 and 2. Yeah.......tell me you're cheating without telling me you're cheating.

This also reminds me of the Keri Lake AZ governors election. No way, no how could Lake be allowed to win and expose their treachery so they pulled out all the stops, shut machines down (remember the printer malfunctions....the ones that were supposedly tested before the election?) in day of voting and made people who stayed to vote put their ballot in a black box to be counted later.

These people don't even hide it any more. It just is what it is and people chose to accept it and their "elected" leaders sit on the sidelines and allow it to happen time and time again.
 
dbair1967

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
71,132
Reaction score
19,282
Dodger12 said:
24000 ballots with zero Pratt votes. And somehow the person who ran in a distant 3rd and conceded on election night outperformed the candidates who were 1 and 2. Yeah.......tell me you're cheating without telling me you're cheating.

This also reminds me of the Keri Lake AZ governors election. No way, no how could Lake be allowed to win and expose their treachery so they pulled out all the stops, shut machines down (remember the printer malfunctions....the ones that were supposedly tested before the election?) in day of voting and made people who stayed to vote put their ballot in a black box to be counted later.

These people don't even hide it any more. It just is what it is and people chose to accept it and their "elected" leaders sit on the sidelines and allow it to happen time and time again.
Keep reading...
Indeed, it's a mass conspiracy. Literally 1000's of people belong in prison for life. Many of those probably deserve the death penalty for helping to conduct treason & an out and out coup.
 
Creeper

Creeper

UDFA
Messages
2,966
Reaction score
3,640
Dodger12 said:
24000 ballots with zero Pratt votes. And somehow the person who ran in a distant 3rd and conceded on election night outperformed the candidates who were 1 and 2. Yeah.......tell me you're cheating without telling me you're cheating.

This also reminds me of the Keri Lake AZ governors election. No way, no how could Lake be allowed to win and expose their treachery so they pulled out all the stops, shut machines down (remember the printer malfunctions....the ones that were supposedly tested before the election?) in day of voting and made people who stayed to vote put their ballot in a black box to be counted later.

These people don't even hide it any more. It just is what it is and people chose to accept it and their "elected" leaders sit on the sidelines and allow it to happen time and time again.
Keep reading...

The worst part is the voters accept it making proving the quote, "you get the government you deserve" is right every time.
 
dbair1967

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
71,132
Reaction score
19,282
Creeper said:
The worst part is the voters accept it making proving the quote, "you get the government you deserve" is right every time.
Keep reading...
In their defense, do we know for sure that "voters accept it"??

Seems their "will" is completely ignored. They want it to end by voting the bad people out, but the bad people steal it anyway.
 
Dodger12

Dodger12

Super Moderator
Messages
8,564
Reaction score
6,212
Creeper said:
The worst part is the voters accept it making proving the quote, "you get the government you deserve" is right every time.
Keep reading...

They've become numb to it but seriously, what can they do? If the roles were reversed, there would be rioting and burning in the streets. But not conservatives. But, one day, when the takeover is complete, there may be no other alternative. And it will be triggered by the left trying to seize people's guns.
 
dbair1967

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
71,132
Reaction score
19,282
Dodger12 said:
But, one day, when the takeover is complete, there may be no other alternative. And it will be triggered by the left trying to seize people's guns.
Keep reading...
They know this is ultimately destined for Civil War II, which is why they are so desperate to strip everyone of their gun rights as quick as possible.

Once that's done it's pretty much game over.
 
Creeper

Creeper

UDFA
Messages
2,966
Reaction score
3,640
What's interesting is the Supreme Court is about to release their opinion on mail-in ballots that arrive after election day. Court observers believe the SC will rule that ballots arriving after election day should not be counted. During oral arguments, the conservative justices questioned the practice of counting late ballots arguing that the constitution calls for an election DAY and allowing ballots that arrive days or weeks after election day seems to violate the constitution.

Of course Democrats are arguing, and in fact brought the case against a Mississippi law that places restrictions on late ballots, that late ballots should be counted or it disenfranchises voters. It's the old voter suppression" argument - again. Of course this is about election fraud and we all know it. If you have weeks or months to mail in your ballot, why can't everyone, especially Democrats, get their votes in on time. The argument about weather delays and such is bogus. If you have a month to vote - or longer, there is no excuse to not get your ballot in on time. It is unbelievable to me how Democrats want no rules when it comes to voting. The IRS doesn't accept late tax payments and we shouldn't allow late voting.

I wonder if the SC's ruling will force California to change local election practices.
 
dbair1967

dbair1967

Administrator
Messages
71,132
Reaction score
19,282
Creeper said:
What's interesting is the Supreme Court is about to release their opinion on mail-in ballots that arrive after election day. Court observers believe the SC will rule that ballots arriving after election day should not be counted. During oral arguments, the conservative justices questioned the practice of counting late ballots arguing that the constitution calls for an election DAY and allowing ballots that arrive days or weeks after election day seems to violate the constitution.

Of course Democrats are arguing, and in fact brought the case against a Mississippi law that places restrictions on late ballots, that late ballots should be counted or it disenfranchises voters. It's the old voter suppression" argument - again. Of course this is about election fraud and we all know it. If you have weeks or months to mail in your ballot, why can't everyone, especially Democrats, get their votes in on time. The argument about weather delays and such is bogus. If you have a month to vote - or longer, there is no excuse to not get your ballot in on time. It is unbelievable to me how Democrats want no rules when it comes to voting. The IRS doesn't accept late tax payments and we shouldn't allow late voting.

I wonder if the SC's ruling will force California to change local election practices.
Keep reading...
I say it every yr.

If you are too fucking stupid to get your vote in on time, then you are too fucking stupid to vote to begin with.

If you are going to use any type of "mail" service to turn your ballot in, you damn sure should mail it with more than a few days left. Otherwise get your fucking lazy ass off the couch and go to the polls. There's also plenty of EARLY voting opportunities prior to election day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom