Search results

No the hypothetical subject was justifying spying to pre-empt an attack, and I showed evidence that knowing ahead of time about an attack doesn't fit. After you cried over Benghazi I offered the Russian tidbit as further proof. And I managed it all sans Ben Franklin quote. I did admit that I...

No. More like how I answered your hypothetical question in the first place and you threw another tantrum because you did not like the answer.

:lol It's sort of cute when retarded kids try to insult me.

Nah, I probably just lazily counted on your Obama ass sniffing to influence my view of what you had to say about it.

Post #6 Dopey. Or were you taking a poll for 500 Alex? Also: They didn't need to spy on reporters to get info they would ignore.

It's more about dousing your lame ass theory that they do it to pre-empt any attacks. Dopey.

It's not about pre-empting anything other than political enemies from voicing the truth. When they are warned, concerning attacks, they ignore them: Link

Not even other politicians are safe from his prying fingers. Link

I think it means you should fuck off. :jerry

:lol Emotionally mature...

You changing the subject again???

No historical evidence?

You aren't comparing religions, you are comparing myths and entertainment to religion. Speaking of history, what historical evidence are you going to present to prove your theory concerning Christianity?

There is nothing scientific about faith either, but if you're going to claim anthropological science, you should probably be more specific. No one lives lives by Greek mythology. No one puts themselves in harms way to propagate a Santa doctrine. Similarly, no one has been changed or benefitted...

:lol Yeah, that's what I'd thought. The people who didn't know how anything worked managed to invent embalming by understanding human anatomy, but the fear of dying led them to calming stories of gods, God and higher powers that hold humans accountable to them. Very scientific theory you're...

And you have anthropological evidence for this theory?

The preference for one thing over the other doesn't really result in a fearful need to create stories to make one feel better about his choice. You're right it's not - what the hell is 'rocket surgery'?

Is this an example of one of those emotional states not stunted by religion? Is this a better example?

I'm sure it is a disturbing idea, but I'm not sure why you're bringing it to the discussion. Obviously Dez is talking about death and the fear of it; you only fear a thing based on consequence. If you can, define the logic of one's fear of death based on no consequence and further on some one...

Or if you put it another way, what can be so troubling about simply not existing? Losing out on one more cupcake? What is more troubling: being held accountable for not only your every outward action, but also every miserable utterance and lousy thought? Who's more inclined to be viewed as a...